Viewing profile — hairyplanter
hairyplanter
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Feb 24, 2024, 6:58 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 126
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About hairyplanter
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41900412
I use tayga.
-
comment
Comment #41893578
This does not contradict what I said. Every Debian release is (and will be) an LTS release.
-
comment
Comment #41893537
I have fully implemented IPv6 in my home network. I have even implemented an IPv6-Only network. It fully works, including accessing IPv4 only websites like github.com via DNS64 and…
-
comment
Comment #41875765
Debian doesn't have LTS and non-LTS. Debian has Stable. That's it.
-
comment
Comment #40624508
This is interesting. If you only had IPv4, you’d block a ddos by filtering ip ranges. If some of those ranges were CGNat, you’d be cutting access to possibly millions of innocent a…
-
comment
Comment #40624312
“640KB ought to be enough for anyone”
-
comment
Comment #40604400
I wrote one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40603777
-
comment
Comment #40604331
EUI-64 uses the NIC MAC to derive an address. Linux by default uses it, and it's fine for servers. There are other more privacy sensitive ways to generate obfuscated addresses. But…
-
comment
Comment #40604285
Step 2 answer: To set up ULA, just assign ULA you want to your LAN interface. Default radvd.conf will now advertise that ULA prefix to the lan, and your hosts will auto configure. …
-
comment
Comment #40604145
RA message can specify a DNS server. Mine specifies the router's ULA, which is effectively static, and it runs unbounded.
- story
-
comment
Comment #40594308
I haven’t seen one. Openwrt seems to do the right thing out of the box, but that’s not that helpful in setting up your own and learning on the way. Maybe I will write one this week…
-
comment
Comment #40593914
My experience is the opposite!
-
comment
Comment #40593722
ULA is still the right solution here. ULA would let you maintain your internal lan with custom subnets and DNS even if you switch carriers or use multiple carriers. No need to upda…
-
comment
Comment #40593685
As browsers don't like link local addresses in the address bar, ULA is still better.
-
comment
Comment #40593570
> or just bite the bullet and use ULA. This is the proper ipv6 solution. With ipv6, one ethernet interface is _supposed_ to have multiple addresses. You wouldn't want your lan rout…
-
comment
Comment #39901392
I was thinking “hey, I bet it would be pretty easy to write something like this in Go”. And of course it’s written in Go!
-
comment
Comment #39489755
In your playground example, if you print the capacity and the length before and after “re-extension”, it becomes clear what happened. In fact, accessing item 5 after reduction give…