Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — hairyplanter

hairyplanter

HN member
Joined
Sat, Feb 24, 2024, 6:58 AM UTC
HN karma
126
Public activity
18 items

About hairyplanter

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #41900412

    I use tayga.

  2. comment
    Comment #41893578

    This does not contradict what I said. Every Debian release is (and will be) an LTS release.

  3. comment
    Comment #41893537

    I have fully implemented IPv6 in my home network. I have even implemented an IPv6-Only network. It fully works, including accessing IPv4 only websites like github.com via DNS64 and…

  4. comment
    Comment #41875765

    Debian doesn't have LTS and non-LTS. Debian has Stable. That's it.

  5. comment
    Comment #40624508

    This is interesting. If you only had IPv4, you’d block a ddos by filtering ip ranges. If some of those ranges were CGNat, you’d be cutting access to possibly millions of innocent a…

  6. comment
    Comment #40624312

    “640KB ought to be enough for anyone”

  7. comment
    Comment #40604400

    I wrote one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40603777

  8. comment
    Comment #40604331

    EUI-64 uses the NIC MAC to derive an address. Linux by default uses it, and it's fine for servers. There are other more privacy sensitive ways to generate obfuscated addresses. But…

  9. comment
    Comment #40604285

    Step 2 answer: To set up ULA, just assign ULA you want to your LAN interface. Default radvd.conf will now advertise that ULA prefix to the lan, and your hosts will auto configure. …

  10. comment
    Comment #40604145

    RA message can specify a DNS server. Mine specifies the router's ULA, which is effectively static, and it runs unbounded.

  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #40594308

    I haven’t seen one. Openwrt seems to do the right thing out of the box, but that’s not that helpful in setting up your own and learning on the way. Maybe I will write one this week…

  13. comment
    Comment #40593914

    My experience is the opposite!

  14. comment
    Comment #40593722

    ULA is still the right solution here. ULA would let you maintain your internal lan with custom subnets and DNS even if you switch carriers or use multiple carriers. No need to upda…

  15. comment
    Comment #40593685

    As browsers don't like link local addresses in the address bar, ULA is still better.

  16. comment
    Comment #40593570

    > or just bite the bullet and use ULA. This is the proper ipv6 solution. With ipv6, one ethernet interface is _supposed_ to have multiple addresses. You wouldn't want your lan rout…

  17. comment
    Comment #39901392

    I was thinking “hey, I bet it would be pretty easy to write something like this in Go”. And of course it’s written in Go!

  18. comment
    Comment #39489755

    In your playground example, if you print the capacity and the length before and after “re-extension”, it becomes clear what happened. In fact, accessing item 5 after reduction give…