Viewing profile — hackrmn
hackrmn
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Sep 21, 2024, 8:04 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 304
- Public activity
- 127 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About hackrmn
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49247451
I agree regarding metaphors, I myself aggressively utilise analogies with both myself and others, as a "digestive", but I feel like with LLMs we're treading on thin ice as it's not…
-
comment
Comment #49244661
There's been research done (I know, big words -- don't have any links readily available), where it was pointing to the fact that what goes easily in (into the brain) also goes easi…
-
comment
Comment #49107420
For my part, the make-or-break part of these kind of visualisations -- assisting home renovation, and interior and exterior design and architecture in general -- has been lighting …
-
comment
Comment #49095705
This is the MVP comment. When you have a carpenter visiting you don't announce they can go into your kids' rooms (for reasons unrelated to the job is) and what not -- the [default]…
-
comment
Comment #48984610
I don't know, I was very happy when I discovered what Radiance can do with what you give it. I hear people get very good looking rendering with Blender, but my brain doesn't work l…
-
comment
Comment #48972014
Thanks, I did some learning and it fell more into place.
-
comment
Comment #48966155
Is transcription a form of _inference_ though? I mean I see the word being thrown around and I understand what it means (or at least I think I do) in context of LLMs doing the thin…
-
comment
Comment #48920255
Ok, I admit arguing about Git's merits, best practices, workflows and so on, can be hard online like this, not the least because I have limited amount of time I can invest in this …
-
comment
Comment #48919341
No, boss -- you suck. See what I did there?
-
comment
Comment #48919145
I think you missed the main point of my argument -- you, the game developer, aren't programming the hardware directly or through the kernel -- you are using a common abstraction in…
-
comment
Comment #48905316
If you want that, mandate developers use prefixes like `!fixup` and do `git rebase` _on your end_ -- why force upon everyone your ideas especially if it also squashes all developme…
-
comment
Comment #48904964
A linear graph doesn't do any developer in the team except Github (which isn't a developer in this context) any good because they have to pull down the graph at some point and when…
-
comment
Comment #48904392
My observation has been that those who have never learned Git properly -- disregarding for a moment the issue with what "properly" means here -- just don't think they need to, stic…
-
comment
Comment #48904256
I last wrote 3-D rendering code using hardware in 2005 or so. It was DirectX 11 or 12, I don't recall. I thought it was quite a mountain to climb. For my part, I grew up _implement…
-
comment
Comment #48897631
I seem to remember to have watched a recent comparison on YT between Second Reality using SB vs GUS, and I did appreciate an audible improvement with the latter, but it may have be…
-
comment
Comment #48891362
Yeah, it infused my software engineering career and interest in optimisation and 3-D rendering. P.S. When we invent the time machine, we should go back to load up on actual GUS _an…
-
comment
Comment #48890227
I think a fundamental and flawed assumption in your general line of argument boils down to that line: > Social people will be fine Thing is, "social" is not only a scale, it's not …
-
comment
Comment #48890178
During my teenage years in what is today a post-Soviet country -- to put it in apt context -- I was briefly an absolutely ecstatic owner of a Gravis Ultrasound (Classic, I believe)…
-
comment
Comment #48836029
Fewer people aren't staring into their phones or talking to them -- makes your social antennas pick up automatically on not wanting to disturb them (lest you draw their ire for not…
-
comment
Comment #48821710
Right, if what you mean is making the `=""` optional, then it seems even more attractive than types, I admit. You'd have to amend the XML grammar to see if making the `=""` optiona…
-
comment
Comment #48821603
Can you think of a minor syntax error example that you believe should be corrected by the browser, and better than the author would (had the Web browser notified them early -- by a…
-
comment
Comment #48821454
I think this is _the_ most popular criticism of HTML 5 vs. XML, that I have seen mentioned. Which is telling, quite frankly. It makes me think that the powers that be that pushed H…
-
comment
Comment #48821371
I looked at CSTML, and frankly, it looks like any other improvement that upon first glance may seem like definite improvement, but the trouble with these dialects or ideas is that …
-
comment
Comment #48821230
I agree we shouldn't have thrown the baby out with the bathwater -- and it's not like _strictness_ was not in XML's spirit, so your usual suspects for primitive types -- numbers an…
-
comment
Comment #48797195
Every time XML comes up, I feel obligated to share my opinion (I too wrote XML a the turn of the millennium and have seen it become and still witness on occasion it being excommuni…