Viewing profile — hacking_again
hacking_again
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 19, 2017, 4:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 82
- Public activity
- 76 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About hacking_again
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #15475193
This is probably libel, and regardless it's character assassination that reflects more badly on management than it does on Rick.
-
comment
Comment #15474851
Ok, so what changes would you make to my explanations?
-
comment
Comment #15474282
> raising the price of goods by locking out foreign competition is regressive: the made-in-America premium hurts most when you have the least to spend you could always lower sales …
-
comment
Comment #15473355
Learn them both at the same time. Pick two small projects. For project 1, implement it in Python, then implement it in C. For project 2, implement it in C, then re-implement it in …
-
comment
Comment #15473241
In theory yes, if you have an impartial third-party monopoly, but in practice it's still might-makes-right, where might = money, lawyers, political connections, ethnicity, etc. It'…
-
comment
Comment #15471179
Eh, I don't disagree, I was just trying to distinguish between property existing and objects existing. But maybe force defines existence all the way down.
-
comment
Comment #15471157
And you won't get far with source modifications if you can't run the program.
-
comment
Comment #15470022
This doesn't mean property exists in the same way that objects exist. A piece of property is just a protected object.
-
comment
Comment #15469157
Well, maybe it's more accurate to say that it's impossible to consent because no consent is required to take someone's picture in public. People generally exercise control by choos…
-
comment
Comment #15466871
I don't disagree with you, but human society exists because of our ability to control violence via intellectual rules.
-
comment
Comment #15463610
It's valid if X is having your picture taken and Y is being in public.
-
comment
Comment #15463542
Python has its share of cruft and idiosyncrasies. I find some of the syntax irritating, e.g. boolean logic, argument handling, hidden / private / magic symbols, and those pesky hal…
-
comment
Comment #15463117
More or less, assuming you can predict it. But there's a penalty for misprediction. So it boils down to whether using % frequently (either as a native instruction or as a sequence …
-
comment
Comment #15462806
Are your parents truly completely different people?
-
comment
Comment #15462513
On their own, % and / are way slower than +, -, *, >. Cycle counts depend on your architecture, you can look them up. That mod is so slow and should be avoided is a kind of folklor…
-
comment
Comment #15462382
It doesn't have to be intended. It's just that every time you write or speak you communicate group membership. For example, there are further implications about group membership wh…
-
comment
Comment #15461821
Well, it's faster than %, but I bet it's premature.
-
comment
Comment #15460379
The other primary purpose of language is communicating group membership. For example, it's reasonable to guess that you belong to the "uses version control" group by your use of th…
-
comment
Comment #15453658
Go on then, enlighten us with the definition, and failing that, the most precise definition you can give.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #15418108
In my experience the public face of Japanese society is very polite, but that's distinct from what can be said with the language, and what people say with the language in private f…
-
comment
Comment #15413287
According to the suffering and environmental damage line of reasoning, the reason meat is strictly worse is because if you grew plants instead of animals you'd have 8x as many calo…
-
comment
Comment #15410810
So we're labeling people as mentally ill with a view towards criticizing them and their opinions now?
-
comment
Comment #15410610
Why bridge? Any good resources you recommend? How many hours per week do you think it takes? I was thinking about playing one of those play money games for a year or so.
-
comment
Comment #15407002
> Mozilla is not a company Mozilla Corp. is taxable and had revenues of $329.5 million in 2014 per Wikipedia. Most of that money came from Google in exchange for making Google the …