Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — gxti

gxti

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jun 06, 2010, 12:52 AM UTC
HN karma
473
Public activity
163 items

About gxti

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #2075878

    How about criticizing the article instead of the person? Hero worship gets us nowhere.

  2. comment
    Comment #2075865

    Yes, in order to validate the chain of trust the TLD must be signed but sibling 2LDs have nothing to do with whether a particular 2LD can be signed. If wikipedia.org wants to sign,…

  3. comment
    Comment #2075847

    Phreebird isn't critical in any way to the arguments he makes, it's simply offered as an example of online signing with DNSSEC. It's right there in the first paragraph, mentioned a…

  4. comment
    Comment #2068525

    Which would be only marginally more specific. Humans have been eating "artificial", "synthetic" foods for thousands of years, and all of these things are made from "natural" ingred…

  5. comment
    Comment #2063528

    You could use a Diffie-Hellman exchange to get a shared secret so things are "obscured by default" but not trusted, then let higher layers deal with trust validation. For example, …

  6. comment
    Comment #2063394

    I use my own MX rubber-banded together with Postfix, SpamAssassin, and dovecot IMAP. I also have bucket.mydomain pointed to mailinator.com so I can use addresses under that domain …

  7. comment
    Comment #2029382

    Apple adopted H.264 years ago -- it's basically all they use.

  8. comment
    Comment #2028803

    They're not sitting around a conference table in an underground bunker, stroking their beards and cackling maniacally while trying to screw the open source community as hard as pos…

  9. comment
    Comment #2025983

    That is, until it starts taking over the target computers and clicking the links itself. Any naive utility function will produce undesired side effects: http://wiki.lesswrong.com/w…

  10. comment
    Comment #2017146

    > The author's whole premise is that dropping out is universally bad and should be discouraged, and that staying in school is universally good. No, the entire premise is in the tit…

  11. comment
    Comment #2008245

    Clarify? Collision attacks by definition do not feature an existing digest as input so they are not useful for breaking into a system secured with a digest.

  12. comment
    Comment #2008225

    You are right, of course. I wrote that as 'ideal digest' instead of MD5 then rewrote it. Specific digests always lose a few bits in real life, or in MD5's case, most of the bits...…

  13. comment
    Comment #2007145

    The Quebecois are particularly fond of religious imagery as a basis for cursing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_French_profanity

  14. comment
    Comment #2006775

    Actually you can (almost surely) stop cracking at 16 bytes, because that's how long MD5 digests are and any more bits than that are going to give you hashes you've already seen. Yo…

  15. comment
    Comment #2006768

    You can upgrade passwords when the user logs in. The sanest thing to do seems to be to store all the public variables (work factor, salt) alongside the digest so each password can …

  16. comment
    Comment #2006721

    > is it possible, given the ciphertext, to know roughly how much work is required to test a password? The work factor is an input to the digest function, both when creating and whe…

  17. comment
    Comment #2006704

    To nitpick, the topic at hand is pre-image attacks, not collision attacks. Pre-image is where you know the hash and want the plaintext, collision is where you create two plaintexts…

  18. comment
    Comment #1990414

    Why does the font size change randomly throughout the article?

  19. comment
    Comment #1980387

    You didn't explain why rewriting local, private history breaks any of those things unless you keep your local, private branches around indefinitely in un-rewritten form. If I rebas…

  20. comment
    Comment #1975313

    The answer to a question in a headline is always the null hypothesis. In this case, "no".

  21. comment
    Comment #1971883

    > How does one revert this without physical access to the drive? I know this was a rhetorical question, but I'll answer anyway: It isn't possible. Not only is there no way to read …

  22. comment
    Comment #1971853

    If I were writing a block provisioning system I would keep a map of what blocks have not yet been written to and always read zero for those blocks. Then the first time it is writte…

  23. comment
    Comment #1969819

    Individual streams aren't parallelizable, but if you have many streams open at once you could hypothetically process them together in parallel instead of separately in parallel as …

  24. comment
    Comment #1958373

    I would downvote if I could even though it's now at 5 points. Topical or not, it's still a content-free post.

  25. comment
    Comment #1956447

    "copies of the Software" Doesn't say anything about the name. Trademark law and copyright law are related but very distinct. If Oracle owns and enforces the trademark "Hudson" in t…