Viewing profile — gvinciguerra
gvinciguerra
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jan 25, 2021, 9:01 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 86
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About gvinciguerra
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25932394
Hi @magicalhippo and @midjji. Please, have a look at the main repo, I just uploaded an implementation of the multidimensional PGM-index supporting orthogonal range searches ;)
-
comment
Comment #25932347
Hi @crazypython and thank you! Yep, I just added an implementation of the multidimensional PGM-index in the main repo. If you want to improve it, you are more than welcome. Drop me…
-
comment
Comment #25918394
Not at all @virattara ;) I don't have an answer right now, I just need to think about it more deeply
-
comment
Comment #25906674
From a Big-Oh point of view, the answer is a big yes. No matter the memory technology or the disk page size, be it 256B or 16KB, the PGM-index can scale as B-trees or even better (…
-
comment
Comment #25905569
Thank you so much for your interest, BenoitP! Right now I'm focusing more on the design of compressed data structures. RDBMS are complex systems, and gaining sufficient knowledge o…
-
comment
Comment #25905133
Hi @Gh0stRAT, you are very welcome! For prefix search on strings, I recommend the classic String B-tree paper ( https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/301970.301973 ). Among recent results…
-
comment
Comment #25904911
Hi @kreeben, the construction is very fast, it can be done in linear time with a single scan of the data. Just to give you some figures, we constructed a PGM-index on 10^12 key-val…
-
comment
Comment #25904187
Thank you @mr_gibbins. I think an implementation in RDBMS is worth exploring. After all, the page size of the PGM-index can be tuned to match the one of the media you are storing y…
-
comment
Comment #25903851
Hi @thesz! The experiment you are referring to is done in main memory with an optimised in-memory B+tree implementation. We didn't plot the performance for larger page sizes becaus…
-
comment
Comment #25902988
Hi Jouni! You may find interesting these other papers of ours: - The ALENEX21 paper "A 'learned' approach to quicken and compress rank/select dictionaries" ( http://pages.di.unipi.…
-
comment
Comment #25902873
Yep, I'm working on a multidimensional version that I hope to upload to the main repo ( https://github.com/gvinciguerra/PGM-index ) in a few weeks.
-
comment
Comment #25902859
You are right, variable-length strings are difficult. You could try to pack as many characters as possible in a computer word (or in a big int data type), say P characters, and the…
-
comment
Comment #25902731
Yep, in that case you could use an indirection vector containing, for each key k, the offset to the first byte of k. This is what is typically done in B-trees, where the indirectio…
-
comment
Comment #25902096
Hi @zupa-hu! In the paper we focused on indexing keys, as the compression of keys and values is an orthogonal problem. For example, you can compress disk pages containing keys and …
-
comment
Comment #25902027
Hi @jabberwcky! The plot refers to a B+tree implementation optimised for main-memory ( https://panthema.net/2007/stx-btree/ ). We didn't show the performance for larger/smaller pag…
-
comment
Comment #25901889
Hi @etaioinshrdlu! The worst-case bounds are discussed in *Section 2.2* and *Theorem 1*. Essentially, we have the following bounds: Query: O(log_c(m) log_2(ε/B)) I/Os Space of the …
-
comment
Comment #25901426
Hi @legulere! Yep, the example of Figure 2 shows only a static PGM-index on a sorted array. Insertion and deletions are discussed in Section 3 "Dynamic PGM-index" and experimented …
-
comment
Comment #25901360
Hello everyone. I'm Giorgio, the co-author of the PGM-index paper together with Paolo Ferragina. First of all, I'd like to thank @hbrundage for sharing our work here and also all t…