Viewing profile — gurachek
gurachek
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 12, 2019, 6:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 21
- Public activity
- 26 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About gurachek
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48880667
I think engineers are misreading part of the 2026 job market. Some roles are not being eliminated. They are never being created. That distinction matters because layoffs recover cy…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47562954
Yeah, I think so. So far, Claude Opus is the only model I found that doesn't fold under the minimal pressure and can push back, but still - push just a little bit harder and it's b…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47555406
I had exactly this between two LLMs in my project. An evaluator model that was supposed to grade a coaching model's work. Except it could see the coach's notes, so it just... agree…
-
comment
Comment #47550799
The examples in the article are all big scary wipes, But I think the more common damage is way smaller and harder to notice. I've been using claude code daily for months and the wo…
-
comment
Comment #47550778
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47526008
The compounding booboos bit is the key insight here. Humans are a bottleneck and that bottleneck is actually load-bearing. You feel the pain of bad decisions slowly enough to cours…
-
comment
Comment #47525149
Raw audio is a cool idea! I've seen a similar approach in other domains, "keep the source of truth accessible so you can verify the AI output against it". I wouldn't go as far as "…
-
comment
Comment #47525080
The float comparison slider is great. One thing from practical experience - the quality gap between model sizes shows up in a way benchmarks don't capture. I have a system where a …
-
comment
Comment #47524672
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47524530
The union rep gets it - people improvise when you cut their tools and then threaten discipline for improvising. That memo is how you make staff hide things instead of asking for he…
-
comment
Comment #47479830
Yeeah, LLMs are the perfect procrastination tool because they feel productive. You're "learning", you're "exploring", you're having this great conversation about the problem. And t…
-
comment
Comment #47479073
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47479059
Your "no compiler" rule on day 3 taught you more than the LLM did. The LLM made concepts click. But the binary search vanishing under interview stress proves that understanding som…
-
comment
Comment #47283249
I wrote this after going through Fabric HQ's data. The 61% stat surprised me - the cheating actually works, at least for now. Happy to discuss the implications.
- story
-
comment
Comment #47233051
Forgot to include: answers not stored. Here is DB schema(content hash is to save money on requests with the same answer): | # | column_name | data_type | |----|--------------|-----…
-
comment
Comment #47232851
I built this because it's easier for me to treat interview & job search as a math game, and math needs numbers(lol?). The original component works with voice, because engineers del…
- story
-
story
Show HN: Prepto.tech – Interviews are simple with AI (no cheating)
I've been through 50+ technical interviews as both a candidate and an interviewer. The current system is broken: we memorize algorithms we'll never use while real job skills go unt…
- comment
- story
-
comment
Comment #31531891
Hey guys! It's a concept at the moment. But still, what do you think about such a tool if it's real? Should I invest more time building such stuff?