Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — gugagore

gugagore

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jan 20, 2015, 5:02 PM UTC
HN karma
1,750
Public activity
983 items

About gugagore

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49148352

    https://xenaproject.wordpress.com/2020/07/05/division-by-zer...

  2. comment
    Comment #49072004

    > they encourage grouping everything that concerns a value ("put this value in a dependent type that encodes everything known about it") I understood you to be saying "bundling is …

  3. comment
    Comment #48667285

    To say nothing of "Swift for TensorFlow" when Julialang was an option. To each their own!

  4. comment
    Comment #48628173

    I follow your connection, though I think your unit analogy is a strawman. Do you want to give two different types to complex numbers, depending on whether a given complex number re…

  5. comment
    Comment #48628143

    https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/torsors.html The distinction is whether zero is meaningful independent of a choice of origin. Zero displacement is meaningful. Zero position is arbit…

  6. comment
    Comment #48618805

    The part in this that I most question / deviate from is what I've quoted below about having distinctions (syntactically?) between objects and operations. Conceptually, it's a good …

  7. comment
    Comment #48593871

    People are jumping on it being an important file to review. You don't want to ignore the diff. Even if that's true, you definitely do not want to attempt merge two lock files, and …

  8. comment
    Comment #47823856

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floptical A related technology with a name that already answers your question.

  9. comment
    Comment #47762806

    If there is a stack of size n and you make a modification at the first change, closest to the trunk, is there a single git command you can run to rebase the other n-1 branches and …

  10. comment
    Comment #47753547

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mead%E2%80%93Conway_VLSI_chip_... I'm guessing is what they're really talking about. Which is not about NAND gates.

  11. comment
    Comment #47697154

    They are referring to the comment ("You're pointing out a real conceptual issue ..."), not the article.

  12. comment
    Comment #47178794

    Have you heard the thought that LLM hallucinations when coding within an API / framework are feature requests against the same? I have a suspicion that Julia, owing to multiple dis…

  13. comment
    Comment #46927261

    Woodworking is, like, the quintessential craft. I think it is very useful to bring it in when discussion "craft"! I am not myself a woodworker, however I have understood that part …

  14. comment
    Comment #46566380

    "sound bites pop radio" of 1999 has made a comeback, But worse.

  15. comment
    Comment #46499059

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsumption_architecture

  16. comment
    Comment #46380187

    For some more depth into the "bloat" of bazel, I like this reference: https://fzakaria.com/2024/02/27/hermetic-but-at-what-cost

  17. comment
    Comment #46142681

    > Intel's first 32-bit microprocessor was the iAPX 432, which was introduced in 1981, but was not a commercial success. It had an advanced capability-based object-oriented architec…

  18. story
  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #45945718

    Are the 50 for loops truly necessary in the manual C code example of a Kalman filter? At least introduce a few functions (that could be inlined and loop-fused) for some matrix oper…

  21. comment
    Comment #45934895

    Another way to make the same point is to observe that every single society has language. But only some groups have the ability to systematically encode language as writing. Writing…

  22. comment
    Comment #45783408

    Does anyone have a reference to the original thread or issue about sleep(1)?

  23. comment
    Comment #45719612

    The bug being "perturbation confusion"?

  24. comment
    Comment #45711759

    This is the first time I see "SGD" to mean "standard gradient descent" and not "stochastic gradient descent".

  25. comment
    Comment #45702833

    Please share your understanding!