Viewing profile — gubbrora
gubbrora
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Feb 03, 2019, 2:19 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 231
- Public activity
- 147 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About gubbrora
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #20314415
Consider what happens if neither player wants to go first. P1 passes. P2 passes. Now p1 has to play or the game is drawn. If the game is played with win3 draw1 lose0 rules, then p1…
-
comment
Comment #20312837
Just elaborating on this. One way of looking at it is that we turn the attacked program into an interpreter thus bypassing the requirement for executability. It turns out that a lo…
-
comment
Comment #20312683
Agreed
-
comment
Comment #20310361
If we tried to get these thing 100% right we'd not have time for anything else. Punting is pragmatic.
-
comment
Comment #20306764
People with clearance have to undergo regular lie detectors. Wouldn't be surprised if a loyalty chip is the next step on that path. I'm not convinced a very dark future is preventa…
-
comment
Comment #20306667
Kinda and kinda not. They have done well so far but they could conceivably be beat by a dedicated chip. They need make sure they keep up with the research so they build what the co…
-
comment
Comment #20305424
Sometimes it really is different. And sometimes it isn't.
-
comment
Comment #20288333
There is a subtle false dilemma there. That we have to believe one way or the other. A better policy would be to assign some degree of belief to both possibilities.
-
comment
Comment #20286786
This is how you get stuck in a local optimum. Communicate that everything worked in a better way.
-
comment
Comment #20277367
Hypothetically they could require developers to show up in person to their genius bar with government ID. There you would sign a legal agreement. If you are found to have breached …
-
comment
Comment #20269754
I think something is lost when doing this. I'd bet the researcher who first builds a model and then reaches for ml will outperform the researcher who goes straight for ml. Building…
-
comment
Comment #20259738
No. Per wiki. Deepfake (a portmanteau of "deep learning" and "fake"[1]) is a technique for human image synthesis based on artificial intelligence. It is used to combine and superim…
-
comment
Comment #20259617
We've been told that the antidote to deep fakes is supply chain security. It's troubling to hear that supply chain security is already broken and by fairly unsophisticated attacker…
-
comment
Comment #20223953
Is misra as safe as ada? C++ for safety critical systems sounds vaguely concerning
-
comment
Comment #20223660
Making 1kg of wolf requires way more than 1kg of prey. A rule of thumb I've heard is a step in food chain has only about 10% efficiency. If wolves were more prey than predator popu…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #20212920
Not if we use nukes or solar to power it.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #20194625
My impression is that it's easier to attack than to defend or detect. That would make the country who doesn't attack a sucker. So treating it as an act of war isn't viable.
-
comment
Comment #20176397
You can deduce immediately that expensing is cheaper than the time it would take to investigate thoroughly
-
comment
Comment #20167551
They'll literally die soon anyway
-
comment
Comment #20148695
Hence why I said encrypted. The impulse to protect people from themselves is a dangerous one. In the article itself we see that in practice it is used to push inescapable spyware. …
-
comment
Comment #20147361
An ideal platform would use a foss compatible framework. It would allow the user to configure which server to use to push notifications(one server for all apps, since that is neede…
-
comment
Comment #20147060
I get goosebumps by ideas. Reading this thread gave me goosebumps - although I'll admit I consciously focused on helping it along.
-
comment
Comment #20146957
I have found myself to feel much more energetic and happy when I rein in my night owl tendencies.