Viewing profile — grimgoldgo
grimgoldgo
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 26, 2023, 3:05 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 63
- Public activity
- 32 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About grimgoldgo
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #36597044
Heh, still rules.
-
comment
Comment #36597029
I am generally bullish on SpaceX, and I'm quick to forgive mistakes in flight - engines, avionics, control systems, etc - that shit is difficult. But the pad failing is indefensibl…
-
comment
Comment #36596959
That's fair, but also, Twitter culture is definitely it's own culture, and I've largely seen quickly slammed out "fuck you"s to be emotionally equivalent to the rolling eyes emoji …
-
comment
Comment #36596931
Heh, rules.
-
comment
Comment #36596927
I do believe I'm at least attempting good faith here, I just do not find "fuck you" as a tweet, even levelled against me, to be particularly aggressive. Especially such a short mes…
-
comment
Comment #36596859
> Of course it is an attack.. I mean the question I was raising was basically, "it's not clear this is an attack?" specifically because it's not "of course" to me. Can you explain …
-
comment
Comment #36596838
She wasn't live tweeting her hr warning, her witness was. (Who was likely not a participant in the conversation).
-
comment
Comment #36596823
> Or you think you can be obnoxious clown without repercussions? Seems to be working for Elon, tbh.
-
comment
Comment #36596804
I disagree, I think of tweets as nothing - air, fluff, someone expressing themselves without thinking. If someone tweets fuck you at me I'm not insulted, it's such a low effort pos…
-
comment
Comment #36596741
An internal meeting is a much broader category than "a disciplinary meeting to issue a verbal warning from hr".
-
comment
Comment #36596724
You and I roll in very different circles. I've had clients who told me to go fuck myself (and vice versa) without any real damage to our relationship. A New Yorker using the expres…
-
comment
Comment #36596669
It's really, really not. Fuck you has a huge range of meaning. Carlin built several comedy bits around the word Fuck specifically because it was used colloquially so many ways.
-
comment
Comment #36596649
Those meetings are not disciplinary meetings where your performance is being discussed. Everything in a disciplinary meeting is workplace conditions, full stop. And if hr disagreed…
-
comment
Comment #36596615
I have had a different life from you. I've been homeless, I've been wealthy, I've lived in many cultures and communities from suburbs to communes. I've worked tech I've worked as d…
-
comment
Comment #36596595
It's rude, sure, but I still fail to see how that rises to the level of attack ? What harm is intended or possible from a comment like that? Are all rude comments attacks?
-
comment
Comment #36596578
What's your source for the mocking tone? Is lizthegrey known for tweeting about hr proceedings in a moving tone? Also, what is tweeting if not "speaking publicly"? And what are wor…
-
comment
Comment #36596544
There's a great Mike Monteiro talk about contracting titled, "Fuck you; Pay me", so yes, it's not unheard of at all.
-
comment
Comment #36596502
So, free speech doesn't extend to criticism of the government? People should lose their jobs because they said mean words on Twitter?
-
comment
Comment #36596487
Can women be brony's?
-
comment
Comment #36596465
"Fuck you" has so many different tones, and is so ubiquitous. It can be playful, jocular, intense, deadly serious, all over the place. Fuck you is not, by default, a personal attac…
-
comment
Comment #36596414
You are allowed to discuss workplace conditions. That's like, protected concerted activity 101. If the business was uncomfortable with their treatment of their employees being publ…
-
comment
Comment #36596394
My bad, misunderstood
-
comment
Comment #36596367
Is saying "the blood never washes off" the hands of this DoD employee really a personal attack? I mean, it certainly seems like a consistent and reasonably widely held belief that …
-
comment
Comment #36525942
Oh I get it, I just think it's naive. I've read dune several times over the past 40 years, and the person I was in my youth would have agreed with you. These days, not so much. I b…
-
comment
Comment #36525816
There are three primary antitrust laws, only one of them focuses on monopoly power in the way you describe. The Clayton and FTC acts are broader.