Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — grimgoldgo

grimgoldgo

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jun 26, 2023, 3:05 PM UTC
HN karma
63
Public activity
32 items

About grimgoldgo

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #36597044

    Heh, still rules.

  2. comment
    Comment #36597029

    I am generally bullish on SpaceX, and I'm quick to forgive mistakes in flight - engines, avionics, control systems, etc - that shit is difficult. But the pad failing is indefensibl…

  3. comment
    Comment #36596959

    That's fair, but also, Twitter culture is definitely it's own culture, and I've largely seen quickly slammed out "fuck you"s to be emotionally equivalent to the rolling eyes emoji …

  4. comment
    Comment #36596931

    Heh, rules.

  5. comment
    Comment #36596927

    I do believe I'm at least attempting good faith here, I just do not find "fuck you" as a tweet, even levelled against me, to be particularly aggressive. Especially such a short mes…

  6. comment
    Comment #36596859

    > Of course it is an attack.. I mean the question I was raising was basically, "it's not clear this is an attack?" specifically because it's not "of course" to me. Can you explain …

  7. comment
    Comment #36596838

    She wasn't live tweeting her hr warning, her witness was. (Who was likely not a participant in the conversation).

  8. comment
    Comment #36596823

    > Or you think you can be obnoxious clown without repercussions? Seems to be working for Elon, tbh.

  9. comment
    Comment #36596804

    I disagree, I think of tweets as nothing - air, fluff, someone expressing themselves without thinking. If someone tweets fuck you at me I'm not insulted, it's such a low effort pos…

  10. comment
    Comment #36596741

    An internal meeting is a much broader category than "a disciplinary meeting to issue a verbal warning from hr".

  11. comment
    Comment #36596724

    You and I roll in very different circles. I've had clients who told me to go fuck myself (and vice versa) without any real damage to our relationship. A New Yorker using the expres…

  12. comment
    Comment #36596669

    It's really, really not. Fuck you has a huge range of meaning. Carlin built several comedy bits around the word Fuck specifically because it was used colloquially so many ways.

  13. comment
    Comment #36596649

    Those meetings are not disciplinary meetings where your performance is being discussed. Everything in a disciplinary meeting is workplace conditions, full stop. And if hr disagreed…

  14. comment
    Comment #36596615

    I have had a different life from you. I've been homeless, I've been wealthy, I've lived in many cultures and communities from suburbs to communes. I've worked tech I've worked as d…

  15. comment
    Comment #36596595

    It's rude, sure, but I still fail to see how that rises to the level of attack ? What harm is intended or possible from a comment like that? Are all rude comments attacks?

  16. comment
    Comment #36596578

    What's your source for the mocking tone? Is lizthegrey known for tweeting about hr proceedings in a moving tone? Also, what is tweeting if not "speaking publicly"? And what are wor…

  17. comment
    Comment #36596544

    There's a great Mike Monteiro talk about contracting titled, "Fuck you; Pay me", so yes, it's not unheard of at all.

  18. comment
    Comment #36596502

    So, free speech doesn't extend to criticism of the government? People should lose their jobs because they said mean words on Twitter?

  19. comment
    Comment #36596487

    Can women be brony's?

  20. comment
    Comment #36596465

    "Fuck you" has so many different tones, and is so ubiquitous. It can be playful, jocular, intense, deadly serious, all over the place. Fuck you is not, by default, a personal attac…

  21. comment
    Comment #36596414

    You are allowed to discuss workplace conditions. That's like, protected concerted activity 101. If the business was uncomfortable with their treatment of their employees being publ…

  22. comment
    Comment #36596394

    My bad, misunderstood

  23. comment
    Comment #36596367

    Is saying "the blood never washes off" the hands of this DoD employee really a personal attack? I mean, it certainly seems like a consistent and reasonably widely held belief that …

  24. comment
    Comment #36525942

    Oh I get it, I just think it's naive. I've read dune several times over the past 40 years, and the person I was in my youth would have agreed with you. These days, not so much. I b…

  25. comment
    Comment #36525816

    There are three primary antitrust laws, only one of them focuses on monopoly power in the way you describe. The Clayton and FTC acts are broader.