Viewing profile — grgbrn
grgbrn
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jul 09, 2008, 5:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 48
- Public activity
- 23 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About grgbrn
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43886648
Yes, I think it's a very ambigious term. My problem with your definition is that it doesn't take into account the reality of connectivity at the time (at least in my experience of …
-
comment
Comment #43886572
Indeed, I was there, I know. As a starving college student, using QModem for part of it. > that's not the same thing. I think your definition of "connect to the internet" make sens…
-
comment
Comment #43882861
Oh I wasn't trying to reverse-engineer his network from that comment, just saying that this was a thing that was possible and that people did at the time. I agree it's highly unlik…
-
comment
Comment #43882625
Maybe your association would be different / the terminology would make more sense if you were online in the early 90s? BUT, it was definitely possible to do what you're describing …
-
comment
Comment #43882582
That's precisely what QMODEM does? What do you think it does?
-
comment
Comment #42271607
Can you do anything aside from low-effort shitposting?
-
comment
Comment #42265709
So you're here telling people who were actually using these APIs that we're wrong to be upset, because LLMs? Awesome, super helpful, thanks LLMs require data, as I'm sure you know.…
-
comment
Comment #42249753
Before he was a food writer he worked in a number of fairly high-end restaurants in Boston (which he talks about occasionally on his Youtube channel), and then he opened his own re…
-
comment
Comment #38930467
Uhh.. damning praise. I think that can be rephrased as: "It's pretty, but despite being almost the simplest thing you can imagine, it still has ridiculous, unnecessary usability pr…
-
comment
Comment #38930408
Same! At first I thought it might be a Firefox problem, but it's equally broken in Chrome. Predictably it's a React site, using some widget library (MUI) that is going out of it's …
-
comment
Comment #38487340
Seconded! I would highly recommend NTS. Their archive is great, dives into almost anything you can think of
-
comment
Comment #37433301
I didn't downvote this post, but I don't find it hard to see why someone would: * making incredibly general hand-wavy statements implying vscode is always perfectly lag-free and em…
-
comment
Comment #37431722
> VS Code in its current state has no perceptible input latency on modern hardware, easily verifiable. "easily verifiable"?!!? This is a ridiculous statement - lots of VSCode respo…
-
comment
Comment #32520171
Zelle doesn't support all banks - the call to action on their home page is even "See if your bank offers Zelle". My credit union, sadly, does not. So it's not really comparable to …
-
comment
Comment #30311742
Title seems very incorrect. First issue of Wired was 1993, not 1998. The URL makes it look like this is from 1998, so definitely not from the first issue.
-
comment
Comment #28770041
Zero sympathy, fuck this guy
-
comment
Comment #25791957
Also Firefox. I wonder which browsers work?
-
comment
Comment #18377029
Not just yiddish, it's also common slang in many parts of the US to mean a very stupid or incompetent person. So yeah, terrible branding IMHO
-
comment
Comment #9966621
I'm not sure how you square "If you can't keep up then don't" with what sounds (to me) a lot like "I have an idea that I want to implement, but only if I don't have to learn anythi…
-
comment
Comment #4330576
I always assumed it was to avoid card swipe fees. Margins at small restaurants can be incredibly thin, so a percent or two off each transaction could make a big difference.
-
comment
Comment #4106758
It's a complex topic, and I'm no expert. But based on all of the contradictory studies out there, I don't think it's quite as simple as you're making it sound. For example, a new s…
-
comment
Comment #1023165
Interesting, that's the first dictionary i've ever seen that lists it - Merriam-Webster, Cambridge and Websters all claim it's not a word. (As well as google - "Did you mean: minim…
-
comment
Comment #1023000
Am I the only one irked by the use of the non-word 'minimalistic', when the shorter 'minimal' or 'minimalist' is what is really meant? It seems like a serious blow to one's minimal…