Viewing profile — gregmfoster
gregmfoster
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jun 30, 2017, 10:40 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 90
- Public activity
- 49 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About gregmfoster
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #36792594
Thanks for writing this up! I really enjoyed the comparison. My team is considering moving some of our data to elastisearch out of postgres, and this analysis helps confirm some of…
-
comment
Comment #36792567
To me, the critical points here are: > PostgreSQL has a single master and multiple read replicas, Elasticsearch has horizontal scalability via sharding. > if you have a large data …
-
comment
Comment #36785472
I love the idea of more book-focused social networks! Curious what the motivation here is to make it federated, instead of focusing on high-velocity user-focused product developmen…
-
comment
Comment #36785426
I'm curious how much people prefer TUIs over editor-plugin-GUIs these days. I'm getting more and more persuaded by the plugin model personally - perhaps partly by how easy it is to…
-
comment
Comment #36785349
I imagine this would be brutally hard for guitar - so often, my fingers are "touching" the correct strings, but not pushing down hard enough to trigger the note. Piano might be mor…
-
comment
Comment #36779534
yeah, it's really interesting, I've seen this confusion before
-
comment
Comment #36779420
Congrats on the launch! How are you thinking about building an open-source company vs a closed-source?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #36778909
nah, not real, I was just being silly :)
-
comment
Comment #36778842
I like adopting a merge queue as a forcing function to deal with flaky tests.
-
comment
Comment #36778786
It's like a rebase queue, but with more ref-log, and less tree inversion. Pull queues counter-intuitively lean on force-push-with-lease sub-commands, whereas monorepo merge queues …
-
comment
Comment #36778746
FWIW, graphite.dev's MQ supports GitHub Enterprise Server
-
comment
Comment #36777669
If a merge queue is light and fast, all repos could benefit from having it enabled by default
-
comment
Comment #36775856
Seeing 421 on our AWS amplify splash page as well
-
comment
Comment #36450301
This comment seems off topic?
-
comment
Comment #36202307
I wonder if folks can trade in dev kits for the first version when it's released next year. That was the case for me with the Apple TV dev kit.
-
comment
Comment #35817628
We're seeing this from graphite.dev's API calls to GitHub
-
story
GitHub API slow this morning
Looks like GitHub's site and API are performing slowly this morning. Doesn't appear to be down, but appears to be experiencing some trouble since around 9:30-10am
-
comment
Comment #31855783
Sounds like have some really thoughtful opinions regarding code review tools! > "Being able to comment on character-level granularity is cool!" This is something that I really like…
-
comment
Comment #31249354
Proud to be working with friends to improve the world of dev tools. There's a massive community of engineers on Slack who have been beyond generous with feedback, bug reports, and …
-
comment
Comment #30182528
graphite.dev (alternative frontend to github code review) still up, it appears to be just their frontend.
-
comment
Comment #29567338
Love to see the manually updated status page not updating
-
comment
Comment #29567220
Down for us (graphite.dev) as well, running on us-west-2
-
comment
Comment #29421294
Im a fan of keeping my git branches clean locally (only having a couple active branches) and aggressively deleting merged/abandoned ones, though I know that this can be contentious…
-
comment
Comment #29258025
Thank you for the kind words!