Viewing profile — gorhill
gorhill
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Dec 08, 2013, 4:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 4,962
- Public activity
- 667 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About gorhill
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49223883
> can't do "Block Elements" In uBO Lite, it's called "Create a custom filter" in the popup panel.
-
comment
Comment #47903581
Best is to report the issue using the "Report an issue" in the popup panel while on Reddit site. There could be other issues causing this, for instance if you didn't grant uBOL the…
-
comment
Comment #47902581
Reddit's sponsored posts are blocked by default in uBOL when using _optimal_ (default) or _complete_ mode.
-
comment
Comment #46979096
I never transferred the extension in the Chrome store. The Chrome store extension has always been the one from the repository I control, and I've had full control of it since when …
-
comment
Comment #45746852
Those "adblock test" sites misinform people, they should never be used as they lead people to make bad decisions regarding their choice of content blockers.[1] [1] https://bugzilla…
-
comment
Comment #45102888
When trying to diagnose performance or memory issues with a browser, always start with the installed and enabled extensions.
-
comment
Comment #44798087
> it claims to use zero CPU There is no claim of "zero CPU". The claim is that the service worker wakes up only when necessary -- it is designed to be suspended by default from the…
-
comment
Comment #44797973
Those webpages used to "test" blockers are frowned upon, see: https://x.com/gorhill/status/1583581072197312512 There are many reasons that sort of online tools are not able to reli…
-
comment
Comment #44541844
> Doctor Feng, or similar, though I can't find DirectorFeng: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbzzMQ1mNKjAaDwbELsVYcQ
-
comment
Comment #43673729
When you enable "Developer mode" in the "Extensions" page of your browser, you can open the developer tools for the extension by clicking the "service worker" link, and from there …
-
comment
Comment #43326303
It's working fine on Youtube in Optimal mode. If you have still issue, you will have to go through self-diagnosing steps[1] to rule out all the myriad other ways you suffer such is…
-
comment
Comment #42700042
I randomly browsed the site with Firefox stable and I couldn't see any obvious malfunction. What exactly is not working? Is there a specific webpage where the malfunction can be se…
-
comment
Comment #41765763
No competent content blocker tests "ten thousand regexp matches" for each request URL to match, this is not how it works. To simplify, and speaking from uBO's perspective, consider…
-
comment
Comment #39640306
The extension in the Chrome Web Store (CWS) never changed hands. I just reverse-forked a GitHub repo, which was of no consequences to those who installed the extension from the CWS…
-
comment
Comment #39036755
I see 156 distinct 3rd parties on my side if I disable the content blocker so as to let the second-, third- and nth-waves of JavaScript execute: https://imgur.com/a/lZbUqnQ
-
comment
Comment #39002536
It's perfectly fine and valid to question the pile of JS code executing in Youtube webpages, but in this specific instance the performance issues are caused by ABP/AdBlock. The iss…
-
comment
Comment #39001089
> no problems with AdBlock plus on FF Because it has not been updated to the problematic version, which is 5.17. In fact AdBlock on AMO is still 5.4.2, i.e. 13 versions behind late…
-
comment
Comment #38538580
A reliable way I found to confirm whether there is new anti-content blocker code released by Youtube is to visit uBlockOrigin's reddit sub[1]: If there are well over 1,000 "here no…
-
comment
Comment #38500206
> It isn’t “nothing else”, cosmetic rules can still be updated independently “over-the-air”. It's not just about cosmetic rules, it's also about DNR rules other than block/allow/al…
-
comment
Comment #38500013
> one can learn about the no-review-fast-track that Chrome WebStore plans to implement next year. My understanding is that no-review-fast-track is only for extensions which changes…
-
comment
Comment #38499464
For an extension to be entirely declarative, it must package all the scripts to inject anywhere, the scripting.registerContentScript API doesn't allow injecting code as string[1], …
-
comment
Comment #38441839
This was the first commit, and the commit message is accurate about the technical limitations of this first version. If you want cosmetic filtering and other advanced filtering in …
-
comment
Comment #38436392
> uBlock to intercept http requests before rendering the web page. And from my understanding this has always been supported in Firefox, but never in Chrome. The webRequest API does…
-
comment
Comment #38436235
> I get a 3-5 sec lag on launch [0] as it prepares the browser to block ads. uBO is typically ready in a fraction of second, so "3-5 sec" is not normal. In Firefox all extensions s…
-
comment
Comment #38436151
> rare minor annoyance of cosmetic filtering (which gorhill removed for political, not technical reasons) Please clarify. No political motivation went into uBO Lite. It supports co…