Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — goptimize

goptimize

HN member
Joined
Wed, Mar 22, 2017, 6:51 PM UTC
HN karma
-17
Public activity
36 items

About goptimize

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #17211022

    Unfortunately, you arguments suggest that you will never understand Figure 2.

  2. comment
    Comment #16560180

    FUD is a way to make money from uninformed public which still apparently has some money

  3. comment
    Comment #16559562

    They did it before Telegram ICO was announced so it is not an evidence. Now, they have no other financially profitable choice but to make FUD to increase the likelihood of Telegram…

  4. comment
  5. comment
    Comment #16559195

    They invested in competitors

  6. comment
    Comment #16553618

    Try to read the actual article. Your comment is based on a few paragraphs you found and defigured for your own satisfaction.

  7. comment
    Comment #16552459

    Maarten Schenk (resident expert on fake news) create click-bait titles

  8. comment
    Comment #16287134

    It is described as Evolution Strategies (proposed in the 1970s) which adapt individual mutation rates depending on the search landscape at hand. Unfortunately, biologist will learn…

  9. comment
    Comment #15696458

    even more it is a joke to talk about being financially strong=independent, it is a puppet / outsourced browser organization

  10. comment
    Comment #15695829

    You are not financially stronger if one day most of your income will come from a source which you are expected to strongly protect from.

  11. comment
    Comment #15682755

    another comment provided a good explanation (see below), now it remains to check the editor "Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr. van Dam received a research grant from the Nestec…

  12. comment
    Comment #15680758

    thanks for pointing out, I corrected it

  13. comment
  14. comment
  15. comment
    Comment #15680731

    this comment included a mistake

  16. comment
    Comment #15680727

    A review process shorter than 2 months is an extremely rare thing in scientific journal from CS fields to Nature journals. Most often it happens with shitty journals and / or when …

  17. comment
    Comment #15680700

    Received August 27, 2013. Revision received October 23, 2013. Accepted October 24, 2013. Sounds like a trashjournal which would explain pretty much everything. Correction: not a tr…

  18. comment
    Comment #15672263

    when time goes to infinity which is a shitty guarantee

  19. comment
    Comment #15672153

    I didn't know that there was an accusation because we was Jewish. I meant that he was plagiarist and it has nothing to do with his origins and beliefs.

  20. comment
    Comment #15669096

    It would be sufficient for media to launch shitstorm again.

  21. comment
    Comment #15669057

    As a plagiarist he had to suffer. Don't tell me you have no clue what I am talking about.

  22. comment
    Comment #15654171

    Median instead of Average would be most illustrative

  23. story
  24. comment
    Comment #15359583

    "my freelance work had picked up considerably" - she might simply be ready to move on

  25. comment
    Comment #15358436

    "is no longer convinced" - that is very cheap