Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — goodrubyist

goodrubyist

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jun 24, 2018, 12:21 PM UTC
HN karma
153
Public activity
51 items

About goodrubyist

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49076587

    Wikipedia and a few other sites I saw say otherwise for the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service Wouldn't make much sense otherwise.

  2. comment
    Comment #49076556

    All of it, if it was presented for me to accept when signing up for this account. Don't remember explicitly. As I said to others, most of it is boilerplate, so you just learn to sk…

  3. comment
    Comment #49063243

    They're usually not that complicated. And most of them say usually almost the same things with some edits thrown here and there. E.g. compare the disclaimer of warranty/liability s…

  4. comment
    Comment #49063219

    I skim or read all the time, and so should people -- but ultimately they're adults and if they want to agree to them without reading, it's their choice (they shouldn't expect to la…

  5. comment
    Comment #49063198

    I'm an average person and I read them all the time. It's not usually 400 pages long. More like 3-4 pages. If a person genuinely can't understand, they should not use the service. T…

  6. comment
    Comment #49061046

    Agreeing to terms and contracts without reading or at least skimming them is not responsible adult behavior and should not be used as a model for legislation, no matter how many pe…

  7. comment
    Comment #49061020

    [flagged]

  8. comment
    Comment #47637452

    it's basically the American mindset vs the European one (or anyone not in the US?).

  9. comment
    Comment #46558971

    He's very likely being defensive.

  10. comment
    Comment #46270930

    I approve every command myself, and no, it's still much faster than doing it myself.

  11. comment
    Comment #45480458

    But I like the general fallacy behind this that people fall for all the time: taking the past value of a variable as a complete predictor of its future value (applies to other stuf…

  12. comment
    Comment #43372779

    yes, it's the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy

  13. comment
    Comment #41265766

    If you're using a heuristic, it can be fine, but only if you also know that it's only a heuristic, instead of thinking that it's truth and lambasting anyone who suggests otherwise.…

  14. comment
    Comment #40038445

    They really don't have any money.

  15. comment
    Comment #38432872

    Yes, and he is not a president.

  16. comment
    Comment #36486841

    *typo, I meant SSRN.

  17. comment
    Comment #36473108

    That's not the argument for textualism. You can read law review articles and papers on SSRI to find more.

  18. comment
    Comment #36458629

    You should really look into how judges interpret laws (rules, basically). There are two schools I know of: purposivism and textualism (I agree with the latter and it doesn't take i…

  19. comment
    Comment #35894876

    so many butts!

  20. comment
    Comment #35855036

    Were those startups that went out of business did so because of their stacks/architecture, or are you confusing correlation with causation? And, there is a good reason people shy a…

  21. comment
    Comment #35480936

    [flagged]

  22. comment
    Comment #35453052

    Do you have any evidence that "Most people who word things that way don't use the term "males" in a similar way". I think it's highly likely that you do not have enough (anecdotal)…

  23. story
  24. comment
    Comment #33399761

    Trying to influence the racial make-up of a class is, let's admit it, loathsome racial engineering.

  25. comment
    Comment #32917499

    That's not how it works at least in the US, but I don't know about Germany. SCOTUS claims that the judicial system is not for reviewing all the acts passed for constitutionality, b…