Viewing profile — golol
golol
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 19, 2023, 9:00 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,178
- Public activity
- 489 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About golol
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48608603
Cute, but for strange words clicking the longest explanation turned out to be akmost always rhe correct one :)
-
comment
Comment #48382808
Read the declaration. The article misrepresents it imo. It is not strongly opinionated.
-
comment
Comment #48221664
Yes what I was saying is what I believe about the goalposts.
-
comment
Comment #48218527
I think based on the class of problem that RH is an independence result is not something that "really happens".
-
comment
Comment #48218519
I did not have the impression the proof uses a surprising and novel contribution of fields. I think the proof uses standard application techniques of algebraic number theory toward…
-
comment
Comment #48218496
You are believing a very unlikely scenario. I think the reason is that you have been convinced of a claim which is unlikely and indeed not true. That is: >the model seems so capabl…
-
comment
Comment #48218471
You should believe that the proof works at least as much as any ither paper in mathematics. The proof has been scrutinized by experts and simplified and improved. If you don't beli…
-
comment
Comment #48218376
No it is not Leibniz/Euler/Galois. More like writing good papers that contribute to the broader understanding of a theory. I think if one evaluated a mathematicians research output…
-
comment
Comment #46889093
Giving an addict a hit also reduces anxiety.
-
comment
Comment #46136170
Getting 65% of the population to spend 1% of their income on some new digital toy forever does not seem so far fetched.
-
comment
Comment #45985729
I think I should be able to collect whatever publicly available data I can find.
-
comment
Comment #45926239
I am pushing the optimism a bit of course, but currently we can see many demos of robots doing basic tasks, and it seems like it is quite easy nowadays to do this with the data dri…
-
comment
Comment #45926194
Say you want to steer an android to walk forward. You need to provide angles or forces or voltages for all the actuators for every moment in time, so that's high dimensional. If yo…
-
comment
Comment #45916690
The gap between high level and low level control of robots is closing. Right now thousands of hours of task specific training data is being collected and trained on to create model…
-
comment
Comment #45714859
>Paper claims definition of AGI >Look inside >No definition of AGI.
-
comment
Comment #45606933
This is pretty cool. I have several points to make. 1. We all know that Cellular automata or more generally any dynamical system of sufficient complexity (and maybe not too much co…
-
comment
Comment #45509246
If we could build mechanical horses they wiuld be absolutely amazing!
-
comment
Comment #45502300
SpaxeX does clean work.
-
comment
Comment #45203003
Well yes, you can "hack" the pseudorandom number generator, but... that's not really the point when talking about determinism in LLMs is it? I mean the mathematical idea of the sta…
-
comment
Comment #45202545
Hold on a second. A transformer produces deterministically a probability distribution over the token alphabet from the context. Then one samples from this distribution. This is ran…
-
comment
Comment #45003005
I wonder if here is a bug. For me it also always repeats the initial question.
-
comment
Comment #44965926
Hey Mr. Buzzard I want to say I find your work and enthusiasm with Lean and formalization very cool.
-
comment
Comment #44942497
More middlemen = more revenue/GDP, right?
-
comment
Comment #44930451
IMO many misrepresentations. - pretraining to predict the next token imposes no bias against surprise, except that low probabilities are more likely to have a large relative error.…
-
comment
Comment #44808493
I heard the OSSmodels are terrible at anything other than math, code etc.