Viewing profile — goldenkek
goldenkek
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Nov 27, 2016, 12:18 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -9
- Public activity
- 28 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About goldenkek
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #13193140
Reminds me of Ernst Mach's relativism.
-
comment
Comment #13144995
Just grow a pair and talk louder.
-
comment
Comment #13136136
the fact that this has to be mentioned. the autism/immaturity runs deep. you're a good person.
-
comment
Comment #13136109
walmart has a 2 day delivery program similar to prime for 40 dollars a year. they need to advertise better..no one knows (you didnt did you?)
-
comment
Comment #13135977
blocking. blocking. blocking. blocking. rtfm
-
comment
Comment #13135931
This is a false equivalence. As long as the progress is set correctly via messaging (queue) to an alternate UI thread, the time lost will be under a millsecond. The naive print loo…
-
comment
Comment #13135912
Hah.
-
comment
Comment #13135903
Newer means different. Older means different. Different CPU meet differently optimized code meet different cocoa framework. Narf!
-
comment
Comment #13135876
Why overengineer something as simple as a blog?
-
comment
Comment #13135231
Testers are like McDonalds cashiers. They will eventually assimilate with the self checkout. Now, they may be able to get a job servicing the soda machine if they count their bless…
-
comment
Comment #13135224
exact tests on implementation at the "db was updated properly" category are usually classified as integration tests. theres nothing wrong with those. but one shouldnt test specific…
-
comment
Comment #13134705
checking for an insert into the database in the most general fashion is okay. checking for the exact dynamic data?? you are basically copying your code.
-
comment
Comment #13134681
A stub on the iterator interface would do it..but like I said..terrible use of testing
-
comment
Comment #13130471
He means you test pure functions and mutations. You dont stub data sources that your implementations use to see if they were called. tests need to be about enforcement of correct i…
-
comment
Comment #13130438
Because tests should not be more verbose than code. Refactoring the sumArray method to use map instead of a for loop shouldnt break tests. it is terrible terrible practice to take …
-
comment
Comment #13130418
Testers to programmers is like cashiers to cooks at Mickie Dees. I think you are resentful that your job can be automated and thus, the value of what you do is quite low.
-
comment
Comment #13122004
Deprived of happiness is terribly conspicuous. For optimists, this fact plays no part in their existential computations. For pessimists, however, it is axiomatic. Whether a pessimi…
-
comment
Comment #13121796
And in a year he most likely wont. Amazon Worker Jumps Off Company Building After E-Mail Note - Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-28/amazon-wo...
-
comment
Comment #13113198
Dont forget that a computer program exists in the physical world. It is not unlikely for AI that understands self, to also want to preserve self.
-
comment
Comment #13113142
You mean like a virus?
-
comment
Comment #13099644
Fortunately, evolution selected for intellect even though it might have initially have been past a minimum fitness/energy valley. Id encourage you to rethink this simplistic view t…
-
comment
Comment #13099497
Some questions: We act like stimuli are exact things but the brain is all about abstraction. In fact, a certain amount of entropy/information enters your beain every day from visio…
-
comment
Comment #13086823
This article is absolute humdrum. Functions are not the atoms of programs. We now have classes, lambdas, generators, events, streams, etc. There are ways to organize code without s…
-
comment
Comment #13059034
Haters gonna hate ;-)