Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — goldenkek

goldenkek

HN member
Joined
Sun, Nov 27, 2016, 12:18 PM UTC
HN karma
-9
Public activity
28 items

About goldenkek

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #13193140

    Reminds me of Ernst Mach's relativism.

  3. comment
    Comment #13144995

    Just grow a pair and talk louder.

  4. comment
    Comment #13136136

    the fact that this has to be mentioned. the autism/immaturity runs deep. you're a good person.

  5. comment
    Comment #13136109

    walmart has a 2 day delivery program similar to prime for 40 dollars a year. they need to advertise better..no one knows (you didnt did you?)

  6. comment
    Comment #13135977

    blocking. blocking. blocking. blocking. rtfm

  7. comment
    Comment #13135931

    This is a false equivalence. As long as the progress is set correctly via messaging (queue) to an alternate UI thread, the time lost will be under a millsecond. The naive print loo…

  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #13135903

    Newer means different. Older means different. Different CPU meet differently optimized code meet different cocoa framework. Narf!

  10. comment
    Comment #13135876

    Why overengineer something as simple as a blog?

  11. comment
    Comment #13135231

    Testers are like McDonalds cashiers. They will eventually assimilate with the self checkout. Now, they may be able to get a job servicing the soda machine if they count their bless…

  12. comment
    Comment #13135224

    exact tests on implementation at the "db was updated properly" category are usually classified as integration tests. theres nothing wrong with those. but one shouldnt test specific…

  13. comment
    Comment #13134705

    checking for an insert into the database in the most general fashion is okay. checking for the exact dynamic data?? you are basically copying your code.

  14. comment
    Comment #13134681

    A stub on the iterator interface would do it..but like I said..terrible use of testing

  15. comment
    Comment #13130471

    He means you test pure functions and mutations. You dont stub data sources that your implementations use to see if they were called. tests need to be about enforcement of correct i…

  16. comment
    Comment #13130438

    Because tests should not be more verbose than code. Refactoring the sumArray method to use map instead of a for loop shouldnt break tests. it is terrible terrible practice to take …

  17. comment
    Comment #13130418

    Testers to programmers is like cashiers to cooks at Mickie Dees. I think you are resentful that your job can be automated and thus, the value of what you do is quite low.

  18. comment
    Comment #13122004

    Deprived of happiness is terribly conspicuous. For optimists, this fact plays no part in their existential computations. For pessimists, however, it is axiomatic. Whether a pessimi…

  19. comment
    Comment #13121796

    And in a year he most likely wont. Amazon Worker Jumps Off Company Building After E-Mail Note - Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-28/amazon-wo...

  20. comment
    Comment #13113198

    Dont forget that a computer program exists in the physical world. It is not unlikely for AI that understands self, to also want to preserve self.

  21. comment
    Comment #13113142

    You mean like a virus?

  22. comment
    Comment #13099644

    Fortunately, evolution selected for intellect even though it might have initially have been past a minimum fitness/energy valley. Id encourage you to rethink this simplistic view t…

  23. comment
    Comment #13099497

    Some questions: We act like stimuli are exact things but the brain is all about abstraction. In fact, a certain amount of entropy/information enters your beain every day from visio…

  24. comment
    Comment #13086823

    This article is absolute humdrum. Functions are not the atoms of programs. We now have classes, lambdas, generators, events, streams, etc. There are ways to organize code without s…

  25. comment
    Comment #13059034

    Haters gonna hate ;-)