Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — glwtta

glwtta

HN member
Joined
Thu, Mar 31, 2016, 5:35 PM UTC
HN karma
21
Public activity
12 items

About glwtta

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #41930898

    Apparently I am also stuck in 2012 - are we not doing cloud and machine learning anymore?

  2. comment
    Comment #40382641

    there are definitely a few missing from the "not used as intended" list also, are they really counting "rebirth" as an incorrect interpretation of the phoenix emoji? what is even t…

  3. comment
    Comment #30691043

    I would've fucking rioted if they picked permanent "standard" time. I don't care about kids or their bus stops. Also, just put some lights on them, then (the bus stops, or the kids…

  4. comment
    Comment #20999236

    The posting seems to be requiring 7-10 years of work experience, not specific to graph databases or any other technology.

  5. comment
    Comment #18573838

    Why would they? Code from 1987 is of exactly zero interest to someone developing a game in 2013.

  6. comment
    Comment #18573815

    Where does he claim to care about digital preservation? And I'm pretty sure GitHub would have to remove code posted without permission, anonymous or not.

  7. comment
    Comment #15989108

    Hm, I've been looking for a lightweight, language-neutral job queue. RDBMS-backed is my preference since I don't need massive scalability, but do want persistence that's easy to re…

  8. comment
    Comment #14604321

    It was faster than everything, and by a huge margin: https://github.com/costajob/app-servers#results It does seem that immature languages tend to win a lot of benchmarks, likely be…

  9. comment
    Comment #11741578

    Морской бой was the shit!

  10. comment
    Comment #11489120

    Is this analysis really looking at revenue, without considering the movie budget? That's just a round-about way of saying "most high-budget movies have male leads".

  11. comment
    Comment #11400011

    seconded. videos are not useful as documentation.

  12. comment
    Comment #11398979

    "We each have about 20,000 genes, all of which sit together on a molecule of DNA." Not a great start there...