Viewing profile — gluejar
gluejar
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 15, 2009, 12:23 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,275
- Public activity
- 287 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About gluejar
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48162975
I should hit Matt up for a donation.
-
comment
Comment #48162952
later this year
-
comment
Comment #48162929
A silly legal tribunal confused PG with pirate sites. We sent the tribunal a letter pointing out their error but it was ignored. The block was served on local dns providers so many…
-
comment
Comment #48162875
There's quite a lot of information here: https://www.gutenberg.org/about/ All our text is now utf-8. No Plucker! Almost every book is HTML(5).
-
comment
Comment #48162788
only 20% of our books have original publication data in the db. We have a project to add another 40% or so from another database, let us know if you want to help. reply
-
comment
Comment #48162776
only 20% of our books have original publication data in the db. We have a project to add another 40% or so from another database, let us know if you want to help.
-
comment
Comment #48162751
we have a tarball of all text files - link posted somewhere here
-
comment
Comment #48162735
traffic yesterday ~20% more than recent average. 4971601 sessions 177 robots 863462 robot files 3390115 user files 20.30% robot files (robots id'd based on requests/ip address) 5 a…
-
comment
Comment #48154109
We're using git repos internally to keep history for each book. They existed on github for a while, but our implementation was awkward, and too big of project for the volunteer dev…
-
comment
Comment #48152596
Check out Distributed Proofreaders: https://pgdp.net
-
comment
Comment #48151748
wikipedians, please help update this article.
-
comment
Comment #48151741
if what you want is all the text, please use the tarball or data files at https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/feeds
-
comment
Comment #48151663
Nowadays we depend on scans from Internet Archive, Hathitrust, and other sources. Some scans are better than others. Bear in mind that our illustrations need to be in the public do…
-
comment
Comment #48151577
Nice to see so much appreciation for what we do. (I'm the new-ish executive director.) Any wikipedians reading this, the article about PG is... aging. Last I looked, it said we off…
-
comment
Comment #48151489
PDF coming this year.
-
comment
Comment #48151455
OPDS 2.0 coming RSN. email us if you want to test. OPDS 0.x is currently available (not recommended) by adding .opds to the end of a url
- story
-
comment
Comment #24038185
Most visibly, the generated covers, which have roots at NYPL and Bookalope, went into PG via GITenberg.
-
comment
Comment #24038105
More accurate to call it a fork.
-
comment
Comment #24038081
Me too! GITenberg started with a variety of goals, some of which were achieved, and others which were less so. Outstanding, considered as a prototype. Standard Ebooks has been much…
-
comment
Comment #20165308
A few notes on the different versions. The Archive version is a scan of the printed version. The scans are OCR'd to make it somewhat searchable, but the large filesize reflects the…
-
comment
Comment #18519689
added cover, generated ebook files - https://unglue.it/work/378964/
-
comment
Comment #16521917
This article gets its facts wrong. It was the 1986 MARCH Meeting in Las Vegas where this happened. I was there. A friend of mine overheard the saleswomen talking in the lingerie sh…
-
comment
Comment #16518639
German users, please do not access or clone the following github repositories: “Der Untertan,” https://github.com/GITenberg/Der-Untertan_38126 “Die Ehrgeizige,” https://github.com/…
-
comment
Comment #16186877
Thanks for the comments, folks. Apparently this post is too controversial or off-topic (or maybe just deemed silly) for Hacker News - it's been removed from the ranking!