Viewing profile — gleglegle
gleglegle
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Apr 26, 2016, 3:54 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 210
- Public activity
- 52 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About gleglegle
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49056063
contrails.org do a great job of explaining this and have some solid interactive tools that allow you to simulate the effect of flight plan changes: https://explore.contrails.org/ex…
-
comment
Comment #38235676
10,000 autonomous ships to do it in 9yrs?
-
comment
Comment #35304695
Per passenger?
-
comment
Comment #31456790
Good visual overview of nitinol properties here (Action Lab): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65r6Ztxi0EQ
- story
- comment
-
comment
Comment #29291584
Tomorrow’s efforts have been creative and very interesting to follow. It was sad to hear that the demand is so weak for their solutions.
- story
-
comment
Comment #22599795
Not at all.
-
comment
Comment #21493061
This is worth reading all the way through. The script the Times team wrote to keep Bing and other search engines accountable is a great example of effective tech journalism.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #21276916
One could drive an electric car for nearly 2000 miles with that much energy.
-
comment
Comment #21024743
Collective action is probably much more meaningful than individual action. So spporting candidates that are serious about implementing policies like a carbon tax or eliminating exs…
-
comment
Comment #20973379
They absolutely are. Three cameras above the rear view mirror are kept clear by the wipers.
-
comment
Comment #20911841
Just because the bleeding is less worse than it was in the early 2000s doesn’t mean the bleeding is good.
-
comment
Comment #20911829
No. The areas burned in the Amazon are replaced by grazing and farming fields, which are vastly less effective at locking in carbon. They’re also not a replacement for lost ecosyst…
-
comment
Comment #20898490
It's a little surprising that even with a two-speed Gearbox the Taycan has neither better range nor low range 0-60 acceleration than the Tesla P100D (which has the same size batter…
-
comment
Comment #20791093
The Amazon does not burn naturally. Fires there are man made to clear land for agriculture.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #20781180
Definitions here "wildfire, defined as largescale forest loss resulting from the burning of forest vegetation with no visible human conversion or agricultural activity afterward". …
-
comment
Comment #20781176
Blaming NGO's is ridiculous gaslighting. Agriculture and forestry drive Brazil's forest loss. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/361/6407/1108.ful...
-
comment
Comment #20781119
Bolsonaro has clearly encouraged deforestation. No other recent Brazilian political leader been so explicit about it. He has also encouraged harassment and hate towards natives liv…
-
comment
Comment #20781035
His explanation is misleading. These are man-made fires caused by massive deforestation. Sources: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-why-amazon-rainfores... https://science.sc…
-
comment
Comment #20780924
These are man-made fires driven by large-scale deforestation. Calling them wildfires is misleading.
-
comment
Comment #20780844
Your first point is misleading. Satellite imagery and in the ground evidence clearly shows that the fires are almost exclusively driven by humans. Not wildfires. This is conscious …