Viewing profile — glaurent
glaurent
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 17, 2011, 8:18 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 30
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About glaurent
http://telegraph-road.org
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #7441820
Anybody else thinks that the 'Adams' character is the typical bipolar ?
-
comment
Comment #7361198
it's not just the caliber of the ammo, it's also the velocity. I'm certainly not an expert, but I did my military service in a base used for tank training. Back then, it was alread…
-
comment
Comment #6958937
but it's still below the levels of 1970.
-
comment
Comment #5580861
He was not a hacker and that's precisely why he could lead the creation of great end-user products. He certainly did know a whole lot about programming : check his WWDC 97 address,…
-
comment
Comment #4469496
I switched to OS X in 2008. Prior to that, I had been using Linux since 1995, and contributed quite a lot to Free Software (Gnome, gtkmm, KDE, Rosegarden). May be I saw one too man…
-
comment
Comment #4463249
Tk ? Seriously ? > at least 80% of my development I can do on my Linux machine. That's the whole problem right there. The remaining 20% are all the desktop-integration features and…
-
comment
Comment #4412029
The fundamental flaw in CatB is that it was essentially an adaptation of ESR's libertarian creed, that Free Market is infallible and would always boil down to the best optimal solu…
-
comment
Comment #3680088
Compared to the Java and C# libs, yes, the C++ std lib is small. In terms of complexity and ease of use, it's a different picture.
-
comment
Comment #3672946
I know Objective C, C++, Java and have basic knowledge of C#. Of all these I'd rate Objective C as the easiest to learn and to handle. It's much more forgiving and easy on the prog…
-
comment
Comment #3385574
> On a personal note, the effort required to maintain a stable Linux desktop made me switch to OS X in 2007, after using Linux for 13 years. I did the exact same thing (except in e…
-
comment
Comment #3164599
Even if you're replacing the software, having the source allows you to ensure that your replacement is fully backwards compatible with the original Same answer : True in theory, ve…
-
comment
Comment #3162892
> Considering the huge progress that was made in the 90'ties on Linux and the lack of progress done after OS X came, I think it is safe to assume that OS X played a major role here…
-
comment
Comment #3162685
> Community development seems to work well enough for individual projects, but not in-between projects that's pretty close to saying that community development doesn't scale, isn't…
-
comment
Comment #3162290
> Basically OS X destroyed Linux's chances on dominating the future desktop. Yeah, because the constant feuds within the Linux community, the failure to settle on a common desktop …
-
comment
Comment #3162255
> he did change the system from the inside Yeah, no, not really. Linus did, by precisely following that advice : compromise and be practical. Yes, he couldn't have done it without …
-
comment
Comment #3157853
Wow, very cool to see a post from you top-ranking here :-) Hope to see you at the next Open Coffee Sophia :-).
-
comment
Comment #3119650
Code completion in XCode 4.2 using llvm/clang has improved a whole lot. I'd say it's on par with Eclipse now.