Viewing profile — gj_78
gj_78
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Sep 19, 2020, 12:55 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -16
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About gj_78
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39900763
Location: Paris, France Remote: Yes, but Office is fine too Willing to relocate: Yes Technologies: Data Science, Machine Learning, Time Series Forecasting, C++, SQL, Python, Scikit…
-
comment
Comment #24662258
Isn't this dangerous? Scripts with and without comments don't behave the same. Invariant violation.
-
comment
Comment #24530775
The question is not about the head count. How many software engineers at nvidia produce software that is expected run/compile on the host CPU of the customer, like this library ? I…
-
comment
Comment #24530517
I have nothing against the library itself, rather the fact that it is made by the hardware provider. Good or not, It looks like a marketing goodie given away by the manufacturer. H…
-
comment
Comment #24529710
I did not say the library controls anything, Nvidia controls the library : its features, its roadmap, its bugs corrections, development efforts (people) etc. All these choices are …
-
comment
Comment #24529518
> You don't think developers should be able to write C++ code for the GPU? To be clear, I don't think nvidia-paid developers should be able to write C++ Code for a nvidia-sold GPU.…
-
comment
Comment #24529023
Sorry, related to cpu and host memory , I was wrong. I meant : having the GPU seller control/write code that plays with host cpu and memory is bad. Let people use their own gcc/g++…
-
comment
Comment #24529003
Again, I see what you mean. I am even against nvidia advising the developers to use such or such C++ library (be it GNU). It is not their role to do that. We need smarter and more …
-
comment
Comment #24527979
IMHO, the question is not that we need code to run on CPUs and GPUs , we do need that, The question is whether the GPU seller has to control both sides. Until I buy a CPU from nvid…
-
comment
Comment #24527380
Raspberry Pi is not marketed for graphics as nvidia is doing with their GPUs. What I mean is that firmware is running on a usually small cpu and memory that is sold as a part of th…
-
comment
Comment #24527297
A lot of hardware has builtin software, either inside a firmware or as a driver. Keeping the software part in firmware lets customer free to use any kind of OS. Using host cpu and …
-
comment
Comment #24527178
Agree++. They are good at hardware and should stay that way.
-
comment
Comment #24527126
I really do not understand why a (very good) hardware provider is willing to create/direct/hint custom software for the users. Isn't this exactly what a GPU firmware is expected to…