Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — giraj

giraj

HN member
Joined
Thu, Aug 07, 2014, 2:00 PM UTC
HN karma
119
Public activity
41 items

About giraj

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #41045207

    The construction of the type 'Map ' is entirely standard in languages like Agda and Coq (and I bet Idris too). In these languages, Type is itself a type, and can be treated like an…

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #36599389

    You're welcome! And likewise, thanks for the interesting reply. I'm afraid I have no knowledge of your field, and no idea whether there are good tools and libraries for formalising…

  5. comment
    Comment #36551955

    I can't speak for kxyvr, but let me chime in as a mathematician who does formalise my theorems. There's no issue with representing various foundations (e.g. ZFC) on a computer -- f…

  6. comment
    Comment #36542776

    That is an extremely uncharitable take. I find that most mathematicians care deeply that their proofs are correct.

  7. comment
    Comment #36542021

    Mechanized proofs ensure the correctness of the results they prove. That's useful. Indeed, the point of the article was that Voevodsky sought out proof assistants in order to ensur…

  8. comment
    Comment #36541735

    You're not wrong, but most mathematicians aren't working on (or even interested in) foundations. Not saying what you mentioned isn't math (I think it is), but my point still stands…

  9. comment
    Comment #36541590

    For the math that you mention, I would suggest looking at mathlib ( https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib ). I agree that the foundations of Coq are somewhat distanced fr…

  10. comment
    Comment #36539812

    Most mathematicians aren't interested in refactoring their mathematical "codebase", nor experimenting with axioms. They simply want to understand and discover more math. The reason…

  11. comment
    Comment #36539654

    For those interested in formalisation of homotopy type theory, there are several (more or less) active and developed libraries. To mention a few: UniMath ( https://github.com/UniMa…

  12. comment
    Comment #36374227

    Oh My Git! looks really cool and useful, thanks for mentioning it! I find it incredible that it's funded by the Prototype Fund ( https://prototypefund.de/project/oh-my-git/ ), and …

  13. comment
    Comment #36005791

    The paper argues against those who think that "programming should strive to be more mathematical" through the development and adoption of formal methods. It points out that "more m…

  14. comment
    Comment #35919151

    Also "I am excited to welcome Linda Yaccarino as the new CEO of Twitter" (current front-page) is tagged 'javascript', which isn't particularly relevant.

  15. comment
    Comment #35881877

    They explain that they added an "in-app donations appeal" at the end of 2022, so I imagine that would be it.

  16. comment
    Comment #35592500

    The speed of KaTeX is great, but the lack of support for diagrams (a la tikz-cd) is what makes KaTeX unsuitable for general adoption by mathematicians (e.g., mathoverflow.net and a…

  17. comment
    Comment #35542640

    As a researcher, this sounded interesting so I had a look. The first paper that caught my eye ( https://paperlist.io/post/247381561 ) has a bunch of "generic" (lacking substance; c…

  18. comment
    Comment #35041971

    Okay, thanks! But doesn't this still mean you have to compile ocaml (with flambda) yourself?

  19. comment
    Comment #35041856

    I updated the link to point to the docs, which are more informative. As far as I understand, flambda is an intermediate representation of OCaml which allows for a number of optimis…

  20. comment
    Comment #35040770

    I was hoping this post would mention using OCaml with flambda[1] enabled. At least for my work, flambda seems to yield a ~10% speed up when compiling things. Can you get OCaml bina…

  21. comment
    Comment #32493448

    Maybe! You're certainly correct that there's a difference between knowing Lean (or a given proof assistant) vs. knowing mathlib (or some specific library). It doesn't seem to me th…

  22. comment
    Comment #32490266

    This sounds like a cool demo, but I find it hard to imagine it being useful. For one, in order to check the output you need to be proficient enough that you might as well write the…

  23. comment
    Comment #29528979

    There was a thread about this roughly two weeks ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29349240

  24. comment
    Comment #28476721

    You're right, there's a missing step. By "a monoid M in the category C" we mean that M is an object in C along with two morphisms "unit" : 1 -> M and "multiplication" : M x M -> M …

  25. comment
    Comment #24912543

    I wouldn't be surprised to see anything related to type-theory on here. And I disagree that many people doing HoTT today are proposing it as an alternative foundation in anything e…