Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — gingerBill

gingerBill

HN member
Joined
Mon, Mar 31, 2014, 9:30 PM UTC
HN karma
894
Public activity
260 items

About gingerBill

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48884672

    > STM32 microcontroller The answer is "yes" depending on what you mean by STM32 :D But if it's one we don't currently support officially, it should be pretty easy to support too, w…

  2. comment
    Comment #48866055

    Vim does not have multiple cursors which can be placed ANYWHERE even multiple on the same line and at any offset. You are clearly not aware of what Vim actually offers.

  3. comment
    Comment #48861195

    > People don't use vim because they enjoy puzzle solving. I didn't say that either nor even imply it, and you know that when you quote me afterwards. So huh?!?! > People don't use …

  4. comment
    Comment #48860640

    > You just edit as normal while recording, and replay those edits later. And there is the problem. The first time you do the edit, it might be fine, but when you make a mistake in …

  5. comment
    Comment #48860597

    Which is kind of what I was arguing. Understand that having "fun" is not necessarily equivalent to being "productive". And even by an individuals own standards, the two can be comp…

  6. comment
    Comment #48860486

    > The things about multiple cursors is that you think about the processing while doing it That visual feedback is EXTREMELY useful because I learn of the edge cases to what I am ed…

  7. comment
    Comment #48860273

    > Sublime is invisible to him because he's been at it for fifteen years. It's not perfect and the bugs that have been there for years (and won't be fixed) have annoyed me for years…

  8. comment
    Comment #48859846

    That's not what I was saying. I used vim macros specifically as an example, not Vim as a whole. > I’ve had people tell me how “fun” it was to build a macro to handle some one-off t…

  9. comment
    Comment #48859810

    > I am afraid the author confuses familiarity with proof that his tools are better. Literally NOT what I was implying or even said anywhere. Quote me where I said anything like tha…

  10. comment
    Comment #48815294

    Regarding the implementation of Odin's `context` not being thread-local, source from here: https://www.gingerbill.org/article/2025/12/15/odins-most-mis... Another common question I…

  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #47846512

    If you're referring to me, I don't use Reddit much at all any more. I used to comment sometimes on that specific subreddit, but I didn't find the community that great nor the conve…

  13. comment
    Comment #47116297

    The categorizes are useful for understand how people perceive a language. It's a human psychology category, and just because you think it is "irrelevant" misunderstands why I made …

  14. comment
    Comment #47115175

    This might might sound weird but I think that's a distinction without a difference. Those "newline tokens" are effectively the equivalent to a semicolon in the parser. They are sta…

  15. comment
    Comment #47113282

    First, tell me languages which have named value declarations which don't fit into that category. I'd love for my hypothesis to be proven wrong. Second, how are they wrong? You have…

  16. comment
    Comment #47111885

    In the follow up article, I wrote something like this in the conclusion: > Designing a language is more than just getting the syntax right, and denotation semantics are a lot more …

  17. comment
    Comment #47111814

    I was trying to be EXTREMELY clear I am talking specifically about DECLARATION syntax only and how for the most part, the concrete syntax for the DECLARTAION syntax is not that imp…

  18. comment
    Comment #47111798

    I tried my best to be very clear within this article that I am talking about two specific things: DECLARATION SYNTAX and SEMICOLONS. This does not extend to anything else. In fact …

  19. comment
    Comment #47111743

    Hello again. That's not my position in the slightest. The point of the article is to express how people will shallowly and naïvely judge something. It might be naïve conception of …

  20. comment
    Comment #47111723

    > I never got why compilers don't have pluggable syntaxes. Because then you've created dialects and produced the Curse of Common Lisp all over again. Syntax matters a heck of a lot…

  21. comment
    Comment #47111706

    Yes it does. You can even type `;` anywhere too, go an try it. Because of how good the rules are for Python's needs, most people never know that semicolons even exist in Python.

  22. comment
    Comment #47111679

    Did you even read the article, even the heading of that section? You know there is a huge majority that do not want semicolons whatsoever, so saying people should just suck it up i…

  23. comment
    Comment #47111667

    That sidestepping only introduces significant whitespace, which may not be what people want in the first place. It can be quite common to align call expressions by the parentheses …

  24. comment
    Comment #47111660

    The article does no such thing and just focused on declaration syntaxes and semicolons. I can class literally any language into the three categories for declaring variables. * Hask…

  25. comment
    Comment #47111635

    Those syntax examples are literally just general examples, not the only way you have to write them. But to categorize the ones you wrote: * Clojure is qualifier-focused * Prolog is…