Viewing profile — gibsonf1

This discovery fully validates the organic system side of Peter Putnam's theory on induction, the Neuro Conditioned Reflex Principle, that requires changing state at synapses over …

The Graphmetrix patent on Conceptual Awareness interfacing with a Linked Data Hypergraph finally came through. This new SystemTwin™ information structure allows us to capture the f…

The newish SBCL parallel gc is fantastic and uses no additional memory during gc

Its interesting that they don't even mention the key to human intelligence, concepts, in this list.

Would it work with the parallel GC feature?

Incredible! Is this ready for at scale production use?

Systems Twin Intelligence, where a Pod represents the full space-time information for part of the world, using Solid Protocol: https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod-server The W3C Linked…

A key error is there literally are no where close to billions of concepts. Its a misunderstanding of what a concept is as used by us humans. There are an unlimited number of instan…

The 18,000 people who lost their jobs may disagree.

Our[1] solution to that is to use a hierarchical semantic systems approach such that you can give access to a subsystem or entire biological systems. [1] https://graphmetrix.com/tr…

Actually, here is an example enterprise internet scale solid solid server: https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod-server

Thats a terrible ontology (the relations) - needs to be much lower level to understand anything important.

Seems a bit scary that the "source" text from the pdfs could actually be hallucinated.

Does it hallucinate with the LLM being used?

Probably without too much difficulty. If you have a sample to confirm, that would be great. frederick @ graphmetrix . com

We[1] Create "Units of Thought" from PDF's and then work with those for further discovery where a "Unit of Thought" is any paragraph, title, note heading - something that stands on…

[flagged]

Yep, they completely missed the boat. They tried to use concepts without actually modeling concepts, making a huge mess of contradicting statements which actually didn't model the …

There is no type of math that can model conceptual reasoning. You can use conceptual reasoning, however, to do math.

Exactly, we disagree and you are not alone in thinking this. You can use reason to do math, but your can't model reason with math.

My point is no type of math will work to model reason. Math is one of the many tools of reason, it is not the basis for reason. This is a very common error.

The error with that is that human reasoning is not mathematical. Math is just one of the many tools of reason.

Under the hood would reveal that we think in terms of concepts, attributes, space-time experience etc, and that language is just a means of serializing that conceptual understandin…