Viewing profile — gggggg5
gggggg5
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 05, 2023, 8:14 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 192
- Public activity
- 135 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About gggggg5
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34625446
Which was a barely contested treetop-skimming helicopter assault, and went extremely poorly. You wouldn't have any luck dropping bombs like those out of helicopters.
-
comment
Comment #34623772
I was rather baffled by so many sources claiming that this would be super difficult to find. It seemed like such a simple task to drive up and down roads with some radiation detect…
-
comment
Comment #34623578
>As for article 5, that might explain the second gulf war and/or Afghanistan No it wouldn't. The Article 5 invocation resulted in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Assi…
-
comment
Comment #34623442
Interesting choice to mostly rely on SAAB marketing materials in an effort to make the case that the Gripen E is better. >STOL capabilities https://www.saab.com/newsroom/stories/20…
-
comment
Comment #34623224
Political reasons that may or may not make sense. Brazil would perhaps benefit in many ways by aligning themselves with the US, but for a variety of reasons they simply don't want …
-
comment
Comment #34623197
It seems that you're missing the obvious assumption that we're talking about disputes won by the seller, i.e. friendly fraud attempts.
-
comment
Comment #34613239
>Something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matra_Durandal so about $30k, which is quite cheap Uh, how do you plan to use dumb bombs like that in a conflict like Ukraine? That wo…
-
comment
Comment #34613048
> Don’t they have the capacity to produce something of their own? Not really, and even if they did, it might not be worth the effort. Instead they got a super attractive technology…
-
comment
Comment #34613014
Why not? Could you give an example as to why this would not be legal in some country of your choice?
-
comment
Comment #34610992
Perhaps charge a chargeback fee of 40 euros? It'll cover both of the chargeback fees you'll have to pay stripe.
-
comment
Comment #34610981
That's not at all how payment processing works in 2023. You can absolutely "re-run" their tokenized card without storing their card info yourself-
-
comment
Comment #34610789
It sounds like you can't actually find any research strongly in support of lockdowns, and that's because of funding bias? So, we're just supposed to believe without evidence that t…
-
comment
Comment #34610726
I don't necessarily disagree, but I guess you could run their card again for the 20 :)
-
comment
Comment #34610699
Yes. But those are the old Gripens, not at all relevant in this conversation.
-
comment
Comment #34610683
So great that only Brazil was willing to buy them. And not at all because they were the best planes they could get, but because Brazil strongly prefers to not buy from the US and S…
-
comment
Comment #34610359
>This strikes me as weird. User buys something from me, regrets it and issues a chargeback, dispute gets started and bank says I did nothing wrong, so the charge still sticks, but …
-
comment
Comment #34610188
Are you kidding? How is destroying runways cheap? > look at Ukraine Go on, give me some actual examples. What sort of cheap missiles are used to cause more than a few thousand doll…
-
comment
Comment #34610034
>It's claimed to have an operational range of 3000km. Which may be true in a land attack role, but is obviously not the case in an anti-ship role (if that capability really exists …
-
comment
Comment #34609895
I lived between Barcelona and London through the lockdowns. As far as I can tell, current studies indicate that in all likelihood only the first lockdown in the UK may have been "w…
-
comment
Comment #34609732
>Ukraine has repelled Russia very effectively with just manpads, ATGMs and NATO intelligence. MANPADs are nice to have, but it's Ukraine's own Soviet air defense equipment which is…
-
comment
Comment #34609702
They're also more expensive .
-
comment
Comment #34609583
Ukraine is very far from being overrun, almost entirely operates from regular airfields and not roads or other unexpected locations. Are they operating to great effect? The HARMs a…
-
comment
Comment #34609514
> anti-ship missiles with ranges that in many cases exceed 1000km, What now? A Kinzhal will probably fly that far, but it won't hit a moving ship at that distance.
-
comment
Comment #34609376
That's cool and all, but in 2023 you aren't going to successfully operate jets in those conditions. You'll either fly right above the treetops or get shot down, well, actually the …
-
comment
Comment #34609317
>it seems to do well in adverse conflict conditions (takeoff/landing from public roads, etc.) This is largely an irrelevant capability, it's easy and cheap to build lots of runways…