Viewing profile — ggambetta
ggambetta
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 12, 2013, 4:19 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 6,948
- Public activity
- 1,186 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ggambetta
Actor / filmmaker: http://gabrielgambetta.biz
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49033022
My book tries to be as accessible as possible; a high schooler with little to no knowledge of linear algebra should be able to understand all of it. So in every case I've chosen si…
-
comment
Comment #49023531
Thanks for saying that :) Have you built something based on that idea? I still haven't, but I'm thinking on throwing some Claude at it for the most mechanical parts.
-
comment
Comment #49022994
I have a whole chapter on that! https://gabrielgambetta.com/computer-graphics-from-scratch/1...
-
comment
Comment #48909353
Yes, and that actually sharpens my previous conclusions.
-
comment
Comment #48909168
That's the unlock!
-
comment
Comment #48907788
So it's not a one-word theory, it's a theory with a one-word name... shocking. What a clickbait title!
-
comment
Comment #48904860
They used to be called "Sales Engineers". They still are, but they used to, too.
-
comment
Comment #48890223
I'm pretty sure I submitted this idea to the internal "file a patent" drive they were doing like 15 years ago. It was rejected. I thought it was either stupid or too obvious and th…
-
comment
Comment #48747111
For me it was "There’s a clean exception to all of this, and it flips the entire logic." and "here’s the reframe". That's Claude-speak.
-
comment
Comment #48609002
No Striker? [0] Zero realism but incredibly fun to play. IIRC it had a two-player mode (sharing the keyboard) that was super fun. [0] https://www.mobygames.com/game/12380/striker/
-
comment
Comment #48438158
I was thinking exactly the same thing, this is CSP/SR. One of my favorite topics! https://gabrielgambetta.com/client-server-game-architecture....
-
comment
Comment #48414323
I've read that. I'm not part of the conservator community, I just really enjoy the videos.
-
comment
Comment #48410207
I fully agree with you. However, when non-LatAm people talk about "socialism", they probably think of European-style socialism, which is awesome. LatAm socialism is a lot more extr…
-
comment
Comment #48408737
They should just trap Julian Baumgartner inside for a month, with nothing but water, food, and conservation-grade varnish and reversible pigments, and the whole place would look li…
-
comment
Comment #48408619
It seems you're not from LatAm.
-
comment
Comment #48383518
That's a great idea! Just haven't gotten that far yet (that article is pre-LLM, and I'm very early in a new AI-driven reconstruction). But yeah, taking the original extracted sprit…
-
comment
Comment #48381222
I'm very happy to see this! Not so much because of TDIII (which I played, although not nearly as much as Stunts), but because there seems to be some momentum building around recrea…
-
comment
Comment #48355117
Fair, I wouldn't have been able to write Bresenham back then (or now, off the top of my head). I'd have written a simple trig-based one. Maybe I'd have failed the interview :D
-
comment
Comment #48353402
So at the end of each run increment the relevant pointer by (pitch - w) not pitch which I'm sure it's one of the bugs they saw all the time in this interview :)
-
comment
Comment #48353385
Thought the same. Reckless today, literally standard back then.
-
comment
Comment #48353293
This brings back memories! I could easily pass this interview today, because I used to write code like this all the time 25 years ago doing gamedev (and so did everyone else to som…
-
comment
Comment #48338889
What I'm hearing is that the smoke in smoke tests comes from the oil tanks!
-
comment
Comment #48325352
> And the public funded the research that made it possible. The transformer architecture, Errr pretty sure that was Google?
-
comment
Comment #48321854
The whole thing compiles with 2 warnings. Incredible codebase. John Carmack definitely was/is on a different level. Back when I was making videogames I followed a similar philosoph…
-
comment
Comment #48307447
Thanks for the detailed explanation, I had no idea about any of this.