Viewing profile — getnormality
getnormality
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 27, 2024, 10:31 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,679
- Public activity
- 396 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About getnormality
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49178042
One could say the same about the train.
-
comment
Comment #49147998
This is a strong benchmark! None of these could be remotely mistaken for human art. Opus 5 comes closest.
- story
-
comment
Comment #48921459
Germany trading nuclear for coal in 2022, and the role of the Greens supporting it, was widely reported by credible outlets; see for example [1]: > With little natural gas supplies…
-
comment
Comment #48920651
Obviously foreseeable consequences of an action are owned by the agents that pushed them and sit on the critical path of that action happening. The Greens fit this criterion. They …
-
comment
Comment #48920588
> As always with a lot of these: it's not saying causation. But what they are saying is, it would be valuable if it was causative wiggles eyebrows Last sentence of the abstract: > …
-
comment
Comment #48916054
We'll know European Greens are serious about climate change when they stop decommissioning nuclear plants and replacing them with coal.
-
comment
Comment #48855064
> One command. Everything configured. Nothing to research. Being talked at by someone's AI copypasta feels like being in the Truman Show. "Why don't you let me fix you some of this…
-
comment
Comment #48826623
Why do your opinions about what a "well-behaved" agent is override the wishes of a site's owner?
-
comment
Comment #48794144
Seems like we needed an annual meditation on this topic until 2021, then we took a 5 year hiatus? What happened?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48761835
What you're suggesting seems to go implausibly far beyond what the paper says. RL post-training alters the parameters of the transformer, while your f(manifold) idea seems to sugge…
-
comment
Comment #48673799
A while ago a lot of the discussion about overparameterization was about explaining "double descent", the observation that test error doesn't descend monotonically and actually hit…
-
comment
Comment #48673163
So is Paul Krugman
-
comment
Comment #48605954
This app is a great example of what AI does to your brain. No one making their own choices in the app design would make each question need three clicks.
-
comment
Comment #48491398
It kinda makes sense given that one of their major products is a computer that runs an operating system literally called ChromeOS.
-
comment
Comment #48491329
Your hilariously specific hypotheses remind me of how little I know about technology.
-
comment
Comment #48489582
This weird trend reached an apex in a Feb 2026 OpenAI blog post [1], recently on the front page [2], which describes the process for building... something... written 100% by agents…
-
comment
Comment #48485780
No detail about this in the article or your comment here, but the voluminous lines of code get a big call-out. Very interesting!
-
comment
Comment #48439766
Could we hop on a quick call to get a quick status on that quick fix?
-
comment
Comment #48436390
So, did this internal prototype ultimately end up being used to create/influence a real product, e.g. Codex app?
-
comment
Comment #48436169
We've known for decades that output metrics like LOC/day are very bad measures of real productivity in software. But they seem to be back in vogue in the age of AI, because AI is s…
-
comment
Comment #48354809
The social media posts are from accounts for the franchise store. There is no reason to think those posts were approved by B&M corporate.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48330714
Clear enough that my questions can be answered in writing? Someone should do that.