Viewing profile — geon

You actually planned everything in advance, and didn't have to go back and correct mistakes ? Because if you ever go back a step, it is no longer the waterfall model, but an iterat…

Getting to a state where those assumptions are true is HARD. And takes a lot of careful programming. Yes. Once it is true, the code is easy to write. But only because a lot of effo…

How does not everyone understand this? It's why waterfall development never worked.

An engineer using an llm is absolutely nothing like an llm itself being the engineer. The most successful example so far of en llm developing on its own is the C compiler that ende…

You mean anthropic and the others wouldn’t hype that up like there was no tomorrow? Occams razor suggest there is nothing .

Exactly what technical advancement in the field of LLMs have LLMs themselves contributed to? Because that’s the definition of a singularity. Unless they can point ant any concrete …

Probably my favorite Heinlein book. I really like the part where [SPOILERS] he gets back to civilization and no one believes him when he tells them about the widespread slavery.

I fix bugs will git bisect all the time. But it’s not practical if you don’t have a good commit history to begin with.

Only low quality. But yes, building better quality shouldn’t cost $ 10k

> You don't disable anything. You wrote a "trust me compiler" block, and compiler trusted you. That’s the same thing.

[flagged]

How is that not a fail?

Aren’t ms completely dependent on consumer windows for mindshare? I doubt anyone would bother getting into programming with ms tech unless they just happened to run it on their des…

Really? I broke my Geforce2 MX, so I had to make do without a graphics card for a couple of weeks. I think halflife ran ok in software mode on my Athlon XP 1700+. I might be misrem…

Clever. Wish I had thought of that.

Wouldn't the same improvements have been made in zig if they instructed the agents to improve instead of rewrite?

Correct

Garbage. You can't include training by the companies that develop an llm in the comparison against companies that merely use the same llm. Apples and potatoes.

If those are concerns to you, you are not really the target audience.

No. I thought it meant the haptic feedback was for a human to make it easier to find the charger in the dark ir something.

No. The reasoning is just an illusion. As soon as you look at it closer, it falls apart completely. https://yosefk.com/blog/llms-arent-world-models.html https://www.reddit.com/r/pr…

Inshallah

Because it is vibecoded garbage.

Like a horoscope. I suppose we humans are so good at reading between the lines, that we will see meaning where there is none.

Absolutely no one needs a steam machine.