Viewing profile — generichuman
generichuman
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jan 30, 2017, 2:17 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,285
- Public activity
- 239 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About generichuman
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #48712942
You can use GLM in OpenCode with a z.ai subscription by default as well. Also it'd be good if you mentioned you were involved with nemesis8.
- story
-
comment
Comment #46865384
That's cool. I imagine I could also maintain a MinGW package that can be downloaded through the Zig package manager and statically linked without involving the zig libc? (Such that…
-
comment
Comment #46864749
This is very exciting for zig projects linking C libraries. Though I'm curious about the following case: Let's say I'm building a C program targeting Windows with MinGW & only usin…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #46444933
Check Detour out: https://github.com/graphitemaster/detour?tab=readme-ov-file#... I suspect with combination of Detour & Zapps it could be possible.
-
comment
Comment #46439905
Can you build GUI programs with this? I'm thinking anything that would depend on GPU drivers. Anything built with SDL, OpenGL, Vulkan, whatever.
-
comment
Comment #45800985
If your use case is generating html, MathML is supported in all modern browsers: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/MathML#browser_...
- story
-
comment
Comment #45758390
I will be even more impressed with linux syscall stability if your implication is that (some) people need to recompile their software for each major update on all other UNIXes.
-
comment
Comment #45758334
I'm only thinking in terms of Linux distributions since I never needed to deploy software on other UNIXes (excluding macOS, but Apple constantly forces changes anyway). Do other UN…
-
comment
Comment #45758083
That doesn't give you independence from the libc, does it? By extension you lose distro-independence too (not sure if Detour supports musl-based ones, need to run tests). Agree tha…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #45542263
That's only true if you're making CRUD software and easily replaceable by any random programmer. For anything more serious LLMs are only useful as a better search engine.
-
comment
Comment #45358449
Keep in mind there _may_ be a negative feedback loop there. If you're building your software in a way that won't be able to perform better with superior disk/db/network performance…
-
comment
Comment #44906069
All fair, but: > As for the "...latest version of the SDKs..", that is moving the goal posts, there is no mention of it on [...] I thought it was implied since tooling & library br…
-
comment
Comment #44893376
Okay, C++ is believable, but can you really build a Java / .NET project that was not touched for 20+ years with no changes to the code or the build process (while also using the la…
-
comment
Comment #44014099
I landed on "immutable distros by default for average users" as well. It is a more Windows/macOS like experience where it is much harder to mess up the system. Flatpak guarantees e…
- story
- story
- story
- story