Viewing profile — geezerjay
geezerjay
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jul 17, 2016, 9:11 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,623
- Public activity
- 1,929 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About geezerjay
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #20533158
> I bet the compile times would improve if it wasn't header only. If any hypothetical compilation time problem concerns you then rest assure that C++ enables you to develop submodu…
-
comment
Comment #20533114
> I should clarify. Being able to add headers to a project in C++ is easy but adding translation units is not (usually). Where do you see a difference? >This encourages header-only…
-
comment
Comment #20533046
I don't see your point. Adding custom build steps is a basic feature that's supported by pretty much every single popular build system for decades now, just like adding your own de…
-
comment
Comment #20531662
IMHO returning status 400 is only reasonable if the request itself is malformed. A request to check whether a CC is valid does not become malformed depending on whether the CC is v…
-
comment
Comment #20531542
> It is ridiculous that header-only is considered an advantage. Why do you believe it's ridiculous? Being able to integrate a third-party library by just adding a few source files …
-
comment
Comment #20531477
The decision to go with a headers-only design is only required if you want/need to provide templates. Furthermore, it's ignorant to conflate headers-only libraries with a problem o…
-
comment
Comment #20527183
> Taking advantage of so many extra cores by a single process is not all that easy or common. Browsers are both multiprocess and multithreaded. The ability to run a few webapps wit…
-
comment
Comment #20518030
Smart pointers are strangely absent from this comment, which is rather weird as handling raw pointers ceased to make sense and became a pungent code smell with the inception of C++…
-
comment
Comment #20512743
> these days it's even considered "disruptive" if you offer a couple of scooter for rent. Whom are you disrupting exactly? Public transportation, and how people move around a city?…
-
comment
Comment #20510906
> But how does it compare to Wattaboutism does not address the man's problems, including all the problems he brings onto himself, the company he runs, and its investors.
-
comment
Comment #20510887
> Perhaps there is a reason for the industry not to like him since he's competition You're commenting on a man who accused a cave rescuer of being a pedophile after he criticised m…
-
comment
Comment #20504762
Comparatively, service-per-vm approaches are very wasteful and ineficcient, moreso if a container orchestration system is used to manage the deployment. It makes no sense to fine-t…
-
comment
Comment #20484743
> And moved the burden of maintenance to someone else? If so, this is one of the things people are complaining about 10x dev on twitter. Sometimes the burden of maintenance is the …
-
comment
Comment #20457396
From your blog post: > "The benchmarks are not 100% fair" I doubt anyone has time to rummage through 18 months of blog posts to look for data on a blog, specially as you're not wil…
-
comment
Comment #20457373
The key fact that you're ignoring is that, as you implicitly acknowledge, "in some cases" it says absolutely nothing about efficiency or safety. Software isn't magic. Your software…
-
comment
Comment #20457339
If you have tangible results then present your benchmarks. If you limit your marketing to empty claims regarding "the future" and vague assertions on performance then you're actual…
-
comment
Comment #20457304
Why are you hoping that the proverbial pendulum swings away fron Hadoop?
-
comment
Comment #20457284
But claiming that "X software is written in Y language/framework" says nothing about efficiency or safety. It's just meaningless marketting piggy-backing on popular buzzwords. And …
-
comment
Comment #20443330
> "Apples and oranges" is a metaphor for things that shouldn't be compared. No it's a reference to comparisons that don't make sense. You can compare as many apples you'd like with…
-
comment
Comment #20442848
> I don't understand your objection. The objection is obvious and very easy to understand; it tries to compare apples with oranges, and here you are trying to argue that they are b…
-
comment
Comment #20430417
Some universities require their researchers to publish and follow reference journals, the majority of which has been managed/hijacked by for-profit editors. As researchers are forc…
-
comment
Comment #20413667
The article is well written, and easy to understand. FTA: > Norway has found a radiation level 800,000 times higher than normal at the wreck of a Russian navy submarine. >(Snip) > …
-
comment
Comment #20404612
An assurance from a random guy on an internet forum is hardly assurance.
-
comment
Comment #20401021
> and copy over the whole root (/) Why on earth would anyone do that? That's simply wrong on so many levels, and is far from being standard practice.
-
comment
Comment #20390426
> You CAN NOT mount a drive with "docker build". No one said that. I stated the fact that you can access files from the host during a docker build, thus it's irrelevant if you can …