Viewing profile — gcblkjaidfj
gcblkjaidfj
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Nov 18, 2020, 7:46 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 203
- Public activity
- 129 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About gcblkjaidfj
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #26091766
Martin Fowler is in the certification for box checkers business. 99% of the people that read them work at places where they must "move to X" to justify some department. They will l…
-
comment
Comment #26084526
> The reason we abandoned this [war driving] idea: A combination of our inhouse lawyer's opinion Can't stop thinking how every company doing mapping, like google, today includes wi…
-
comment
Comment #26083700
> just like in IPv4 is the key concept I am talking about here and everyone keep saying it is not. Just like ipv4 is what matter and why ISP will never kill NAT. They profit from i…
-
comment
Comment #26083392
> Google has on purpose made Android different enough so that no Android SoC could run mainline Linux. daily reminder that this is only possible because the very people in this sit…
-
comment
Comment #26083219
> The reasons were stated repeatedly. They rewrote the mobile browser engine *this have nothing to do with my comment* I am talking two or three iterations AFTER that. please, stop…
-
comment
Comment #26083183
Take my word for it. I'm still waiting very basic and popular extensions (uMatrix anyone ?) for SEVERAL MONTHS. And try to offer community help. Ha! mozilla have to die for firefox…
-
comment
Comment #26083164
OMG the lack of understanding of basic ad tracking in this forum baffles me. Nobody is going to pay. But if google serve an ad for a logged out (or firefox) user, they get paid 0.0…
-
comment
Comment #26083136
the visionary aspect was that it didn't need new hardware concepts. Just drop the ephemeral ram (or treat it like L4 cache, so to say) and hope permanent storage gets faster, which…
-
comment
Comment #26069227
decades ago i was following a kid's graduation project of a OS with full permanence design. that was before Android and other always on "computers". it was called something like un…
-
comment
Comment #26041554
so they can continue to hide from public that most of their revenue is from secondary use they monetize from their database: research & law enforcement (or anyone that wants to buy…
-
comment
Comment #26039583
technically, every flash memory today is a cube (well, more of a skewed cube, a Parallelepiped) Mostly because they can't figure out how to make things faster, or as fast as the in…
-
comment
Comment #26021655
That is the promise they sold it on. But, point me to a single ISP that gives a cable subscriber more than one IPv6 address. or a /48 as initially everyone was hopping. ISP profit …
-
comment
Comment #26021631
> Chrome can't really be sold. Right. Now try to use that top right "user" icon on your chrome window to log in as a user that is not from a google account.
-
comment
Comment #26021620
> How would chrome survive as a business? by doing *exactly* what Google sued microsoft for trying to do with IE in the 90s. Isn't it funny?
-
comment
Comment #26021598
You have 20 extensions that were "approved" by mozilla more than a year ago! All the others are banned forever. You can install uBlock, but not uMatrix. Many many extensions are ba…
-
comment
Comment #26021568
I can't imagine the kind of Stupids that are steering mozilla, but they definitely want people to move to chrome. They disabled many loved extensions by power users for absolutely …
-
comment
Comment #26021399
Not really. ipv6 has nothing to do with any of this.
-
comment
Comment #26019608
QUERY: is selfserving google feature. But you can probably do it in libreoffice in a way that is less google-selfserving and more portable, by using a macro/script that fetches con…
-
comment
Comment #26019574
> open source project can outperform a 40 year old multi-billion dollar app differente incentives. I guarantee the open source is not outperforming the 40bi company offering on the…
-
comment
Comment #25993238
there's a "joke" on the dweb groups that "SOLID is freenet with less caching of other people's illegal content "
-
comment
Comment #25993209
> If Solid catches on and Facebook has a permissions check saying "Let Facebook do 'SELECT * FROM .;' on your Solid data, how many people will click yes? Excellent point. For the a…
-
comment
Comment #25976193
> For YouTube For the CDN/edge this is irrelevant and should not even be part of the discussion. It is obvious it will not change (or will be even better) for them. The comment you…
-
comment
Comment #25976180
This is core to the onion routing protocol. And a huge knowledge hole on the p2p/dweb and IETFF people both.
-
comment
Comment #25963821
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=nl&tl=en&u=htt...
-
comment
Comment #25960299
And then showing a half-screen tall banner on every page load! Why even bother to make the page fast if you are going me to make waste 100x the time scrolling down to the content? …