Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — gbnwl

gbnwl

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jun 03, 2024, 6:32 PM UTC
HN karma
374
Public activity
119 items

About gbnwl

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49159601

    It’s just a boring and unhelpful complaint that afaict largely serves to soothe the commenters ego rather than point at anything insightful that’s useful or predictive. Point me to…

  2. comment
    Comment #49159026

    I just prefer HN comments to be better reflections of reality. There is an unspoken expectation here that people here know what they’re talking about especially when it comes to te…

  3. comment
    Comment #49158711

    Fair so let me be clear. I’m whining because the “next token predictor” reductionist point of view has been wrong and is only growing more wrong with time. Clearly these things can…

  4. comment
    Comment #49158234

    Are they useful or not? Will they continue changing the world or not? People who choose one way or the other for describing them typically fall on one side or the other in these qu…

  5. comment
    Comment #49157913

    Every day I wake up and open HN. “LLM has made legitimate mathematical discoveries” —> Wow the rate of progress is amazing. Highly upvoted. “LLM does something not good” -> Does ev…

  6. comment
    Comment #49135658

    There are articles with far fewer upvotes and comments ranking higher on the front page right now, despite being the same age or older than this one. HNs opaque ranking system at i…

  7. comment
    Comment #49135637

    Everyday? Which 10 problems were solved by mathematics grad students in the past 10 days? OK I’ll grant that it’s not your obligation to be my search function (despite you making t…

  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #49116946

    I think the fundamental difference between our assumptions is you believe prompts to be optimized for tasks rather than model-task pairs. The only elaboration I can give you is emp…

  10. comment
    Comment #49113618

    Experienced similar between 5.4-mini vs 5.6-luna in our own pipelines but after spending some time on prompt optimization and testing out various reasoning effort levels 5.6-luna w…

  11. comment
    Comment #48836686

    We can assume (outside of Ollama) that they meant the strongest model from each lab. If you limit yourself to just looking at the literal strings in the list, literally none of the…

  12. comment
    Comment #48800720

    How is this any different than what we have already? We've had this ability for ages (6+ months, decades in the AI world), you can literally today easily prompt CC or Codex to use …

  13. comment
    Comment #48671409

    As usual HN posters are hyper aware of other's credentials while ignoring that their BS in CS (if that) doesn't magically qualify them to assess everything in every domain. "I'm a …

  14. comment
    Comment #48629675

    https://xcancel.com/trq212/status/2014051501786931427#m

  15. comment
    Comment #48610302

    Hm first Shazeer and now Jumper, DeepMind getting hollowed out this week.

  16. comment
    Comment #48362833

    Don't forget that the denominator (total number of outstanding shares) will be increased by this as well. So even if the market cap reacted exactly one to one like you're proposing…

  17. comment
    Comment #48328437

    No they didn't, they predict they'll get that much. Also worth noting the prediction assumes running at MXFP4/FP8 quantization.

  18. comment
    Comment #48163818

    Frontier as in "Frontier Model" is a legitimate vocabulary term you should probably be aware of in 2026. It's not something the author made up or chose randomly, it's common parlan…

  19. comment
    Comment #48155267

    Can you really look yourself in the mirror and say with a straight face that fundamentally nothing has changed about the relationship between the US and its allies? Do you really t…

  20. comment
    Comment #48155224

    Probably a better way to phrase it would be keeping “pace“. Yes, they are still behind but by about the same amount as they always have, they aren’t drifting further behind. Like t…

  21. comment
    Comment #48043383

    I mean yes? Considering that we're here reading the news that they've agreed to this.

  22. comment
    Comment #48031855

    What exactly is the intuition behind taking something inherently linear like a sequence of 100 days and presenting it as a graph with no information given about the rationale or re…

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #47965520

    The symbol is not the thing. The map is not the territory. Ceci n'est pas une pipe.

  25. comment
    Comment #47930975

    Of course the motivation makes sense on the surface. What I'm getting at is that the supply of capital vs the supply of potential "control of the future" plays feels incredibly imb…