Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — gaxun

gaxun

HN member
Joined
Fri, Sep 16, 2016, 8:37 PM UTC
HN karma
294
Public activity
39 items

About gaxun

Check out my site:

https://www.gaxun.net

I share ideas and commentary there. Feedback appreciated!

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/gaxun; my proof: https://keybase.io/gaxun/sigs/Vnwyy8GR22CK-Mp0h1-j4JIS9mc5cRmAQ6ogvu_FsHE ]

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #22367070

    Sure. - On page 715 of Volume 4A, he had something like \`a when he meant to have just à. - In Volume 1, Fascicle 1, there is a convention that the "main" entry point of an MMIX pr…

  2. comment
    Comment #22363041

    Nice to see multiple of us are on here. > I imagine most of these checks (definitely all $7 of mine) The 0x$2.00 check I got from 10 Feb 2020 was for one typographical item in Volu…

  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #22358875

    > when's the last time Knuth wrote a check for TAOCP? Pretty recently. I just got one in the mail today.

  5. comment
    Comment #19223426

    The author should have written to Donald Knuth with an interview request for this piece. It would have added something special beyond just repeating what's already visible on his w…

  6. comment
    Comment #16871545

    Indeed. Web browsers are generally free to use and there are several serious contenders and many less popular ones. So the main thing they should be competing on is user experience…

  7. comment
    Comment #15401856

    > hurdle of setting up team repositories with safe credential management...like for any kind of collaboration Identity continues to be the key selling point of keybase. I'm excited…

  8. comment
    Comment #14475151

    I spent some time attempting to work with the W3C Web Annotation Data Model. That data model is serialized as JSON-LD. After spending about 50 hours reading the documents and attem…

  9. comment
    Comment #14412617

    I've been trying out this extension for a few days. What I would really like to see from this extension is a 1-click way to sign any message I'm writing, anywhere on the internet. …

  10. comment
    Comment #13742531

    > Really, what a robust commentary system needs is to map many comments to many units of text This is actually built into this specification. From the Web Annotation Data Model [0]…

  11. comment
    Comment #13742468

    I have posted a couple things related to this but never finished a complete summary of my thoughts. These two attempts come close: In [0], I shared some really basic thoughts about…

  12. comment
    Comment #13739837

    Thank you for the explanation. This has been my only experience with the W3C system and as an outsider it was very intimidating. I'm certainly willing to accept the idea that I was…

  13. comment
    Comment #13739788

    > there's nothing in the spec that prohibits extensions to the set of fields Correct. But since it has all this "JSON-LD" stuff baked in, you need to also carefully define and publ…

  14. comment
    Comment #13739781

    I tried emailing two of the names listed at the time, for two different purposes. I got a little bit of a response from one, nothing from the other. I read the "rules" for W3C grou…

  15. comment
    Comment #13739734

    As I mentioned in another comment, these tests can be trivially passed. You just paste in some JSON data. To pass "all" the tests you actually only need to implement a small handfu…

  16. comment
    Comment #13739697

    There is no built-in detection of content changes in the standard, but it is designed to be potentially robust to changes. It depends what type of specifier you use. The data model…

  17. comment
    Comment #13739662

    That would be up to the endpoints hosting annotations. They would need to build anti-spam or reputation into their server system. Not part of the specification.

  18. comment
    Comment #13739638

    > Is anyone using these? The blog post is put out by a company I've never heard of I spent time trying to figure out if hypothes.is even uses the protocol and data model in their o…

  19. comment
    Comment #13739597

    I'm not sure where else to complain so I will just leave this example here. I was frustrated reading the specification because it contradicts itself. The data model has a required …

  20. comment
    Comment #13739549

    Read the W3C Recommendations for the protocol and data model. Neither has any mention whatsoever of a notification or alert: https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-protocol/ https://www.…

  21. comment
    Comment #13739536

    I spent about 40 hours in December and January implementing a browser extension for Chrome and a server that speak the web annotation protocol and use the web annotation data model…

  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #13028079

    I have been drafting an 'Ideas' post about the following idea, but it's not done yet and this looks like as good a place as any to look for some early feedback. This might not have…

  24. comment
    Comment #12673758

    I'm reading the page on how the distributed bug tracking works. I've heard of Fossil before but never dug too deeply. > But if a timestamp on a ticket change artifact is off by mon…

  25. story