Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — garygao

garygao

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jul 26, 2025, 4:09 PM UTC
HN karma
21
Public activity
36 items

About garygao

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48272373

    We're not trying to be deceptive. In fact, whenever we deploy agents over iMessage, we make it very clear that they're speaking with an AI agent and that they can request human han…

  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #48271099

    Apple is not necessarily against programmatic messaging. In fact, they actually developed Applescript for people to do so. Beeper was using it to replace the iMessage interface whe…

  4. comment
    Comment #48271076

    I think what we're doing is fundamentally different from Beeper in terms of positioning. Beeper is trying to offer an additional interface to iMessage when it already exists for hu…

  5. comment
    Comment #48271019

    yes, what I originally meant was that Apple iMessage for Business has gray bubbles for the messages that you're sending (or the ones that would normally be blue)

  6. comment
    Comment #48270309

    It's not the "wrong" way, it's just different. iMessage works well for businesses that want to create a conversational experience in their customer service that conveys care and at…

  7. comment
    Comment #48270293

    iMessage for Business is very restrictive and has a really long approval process. On top of this, it also sends gray bubbles and doesn't allow any outbound, which prevents consente…

  8. comment
    Comment #48269874

    Yes, this is what we believe! We just want to make existing conversations over SMS/RCS feel more natural and conversational!

  9. comment
    Comment #48269859

    Our goal behind this is to make it easier for people to conversationally interact with agents when they want to. Use cases like customer service or form-fill text backs would fit t…

  10. comment
    Comment #48269796

    We're clear on what we want to do and the future we are building towards, which is an agentic future where agents can better assist and interact with humans on a more emotional and…

  11. comment
    Comment #48269779

    SMS/RCS is better for some use cases (e.g. transactional messaging, promotions, or order updates) while iMessage is better for others (e.g. customer service). iMessage is better fo…

  12. comment
    Comment #48269749

    Yes, I agree, which is why we try to make the opt-in clear. Use cases like form-fill text back or cart abandonment after the user has opted in and noted down their number are what …

  13. comment
    Comment #48269734

    We are solving a real user pain point and not promoting spam. Users want a more conversational interface when they're reaching out for customer support during off hours and busines…

  14. comment
    Comment #48269720

    We do run checkups and keep very closely in touch with our customers. We don't plan to go self serve in the near future and will most likely still have a very personalized onboardi…

  15. comment
    Comment #48269128

    iMessage for business has a very long and restrictive registration process, gray bubbles instead of blue bubbles, and is inbound only. We're democratizing iMessage for businesses t…

  16. comment
    Comment #48268955

    iMessage is more conversational because it's what most people are used to using and seeing. People generally associate green bubble messages with spam/transactional messaging and b…

  17. comment
    Comment #48268941

    For prospective customers, we would most likely try to work with them to brainstorm use cases that are consent-based and non-spam. For current customers, if we do see that they're …

  18. comment
    Comment #48268916

    We're working to bridge the interaction between humans and bots so that automated conversations feel more natural and comfortable for the end user. In circumstances where the user …

  19. comment
    Comment #48268854

    We're helping to support conversational customer support agents that can help users better during off-hours and scheduling assistants that can interact with and understand user req…

  20. comment
    Comment #48268814

    I agree. We're not completely self-serve right now, so we get to talk with each potential customer and learn about their use case before onboarding them onto the platform. This way…

  21. comment
    Comment #48268763

    Thanks for the suggestion! Yes, the setup process is extremely long and requires a lot of documents from the side of the business haha. It's definitely one of our goals to create t…

  22. comment
    Comment #48268739

    The $98 dedicated line is inbound only. A lot of our application comes in the form of warm, consented outbound.

  23. comment
    Comment #48268626

    We are not "disseminating unwanted messages". A lot of what we're doing (e.g. customer support or missed call text back) would be things that users would already be doing conversat…

  24. comment
    Comment #48268564

    We have SMS/RCS fallback for non-iMessage devices. Also, in the verticals that we're targeting, the iMessage usage rate is a lot higher than 50%

  25. comment
    Comment #48268550

    That's why we're making sure that all of the use cases are non-spam and also of high importance to the user. As we've seen through our customers, an after-hour customer support age…