Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — garbagetime

garbagetime

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 6:54 AM UTC
HN karma
570
Public activity
390 items

About garbagetime

go away

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #34380798

    > it is definitely not unbiased. Can one really reach that conclusion from your evidence? A person can recieve sponsorships without allowing that fact to influence the person's wri…

  2. comment
    Comment #34351776

    Here's an article by Gumroad's founder that covers how many employees Gumroad has: https://sahillavingia.com/work 25 people work at Gumroad, but none full time.

  3. comment
    Comment #34349040

    Nevermind

  4. comment
    Comment #34347128

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conurbation

  5. comment
    Comment #34347101

    How exactly does one go about signing this pledge?

  6. comment
    Comment #34296272

    Nope. His work on the questions of the nature of thought, language, and mind is both extremely influential & deeply philosophical. Some of his work on linguistics you can argue is …

  7. comment
    Comment #34296148

    I would say his work in linguistics is philosophy.

  8. comment
    Comment #34272154

    Simple explanation, I'm afraid: I was dumb. There are no exceptions (...at least, none that I'm currently aware of). Dang's "missing comment" actually is on his page, just not wher…

  9. comment
    Comment #34271727

    Sure. Here's a recent comment from the user dang: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34271566 And here's his page, where the comment can't be seen: https://news.ycombinator.com/t…

  10. comment
    Comment #34271651

    I don't think that works. It will show the dead, but not their children.

  11. comment
    Comment #34271468

    It's not apparent to me. HN users tend to think similarly to each other and are often wrong.

  12. comment
    Comment #34271174

    Have you read the papers? Might be they're good, but rejected for dumb/annoying reasons. Exagerating about these things is a personality trait, not a mental illness. Maybe the pape…

  13. comment
    Comment #34271101

    It's not apparant to me. Cancer claim seemed like a conditional one.

  14. comment
    Comment #34244755

    I acknowledge that the word 'race' is used in many ways. But in the context of HBD we can probably limit ourselves to those definitions rooted in biology. I did not invent the defi…

  15. comment
    Comment #34244004

    If you asked them to list races, they might give those out of some habit, though I doubt anybody seriously considers those to be races. I mean, do people really think that the Han …

  16. comment
    Comment #34243924

    A race: a people who have been largely or totally isolated (in terms of procreation) from other peoples for a very great number of generations.

  17. comment
    Comment #34243833

    [flagged]

  18. comment
    Comment #34243810

    I doubt that any serious racists consider that there is some single "black race". Nonetheless, as far as I can tell, you're presenting the case that there are significant genetic d…

  19. comment
    Comment #34243678

    I'm not suggesting that the term "HBD" has other more benign uses. I'm suggesting that it refers to a body of thought in which various claims are made, and that you are focused on …

  20. comment
    Comment #34242901

    > Black people as a whole have more genetic diversity within themselves than every other race. Would you mind explaining this in more detail?

  21. comment
    Comment #34242896

    It seems to me that you just have a more specific issue with HBD than jasonhansel has. jasonhansel takes issue with the idea that there are racial differences in intelligence You t…

  22. comment
    Comment #34242814

    The reason akomtu and I adressed the "mott" is that it was the claim ascribed to HBD: > HBD (or "human biodiversity") is a euphemism for the view that there are genetic racial diff…

  23. comment
    Comment #34242738

    Are you saying that the simple fact that many people have come to the same conclusion disconfirms that conclusion?

  24. comment
    Comment #34242491

    [flagged]

  25. comment
    Comment #34213419

    I just do it the old-fashioned way: memorisation.