Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — fyoving

fyoving

HN member
Joined
Wed, Apr 03, 2019, 10:20 PM UTC
HN karma
780
Public activity
70 items

About fyoving

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #20450713

    I can't tell sarcastic comments from serious ones anymore, deluded wannabe saviors who actually think like that are abound.

  3. comment
    Comment #20450544

    One less person on the payroll to generate negative news and internal strife is surely a positive development.

  4. comment
    Comment #20410505

    "EU paid Airbus billions in illegal subsidies, WTO rules" https://www.bbc.com/news/business-44120525

  5. comment
    Comment #20410432

    Are you litigating the boeing v airbus thing? didn't the WTO rule that airbus is receiving billions in illegal subsidies? And are you suggesting that france doesn't subside specifi…

  6. comment
    Comment #20410382

    If my math is correct then most of the companies are American, and by far most of the potential revenue. Considering the rhetoric leading to this tax and the french government's ma…

  7. comment
    Comment #20410333

    Even with recent tariffs, US tariffs are still generally low, it's hardly a poster child for "protectionism", the EU has other barriers in addition to tariffs and much of it is due…

  8. comment
    Comment #20410292

    That's adorable.

  9. comment
    Comment #20410199

    Shouldn't be a long inquiry, this tax is textbook discriminatory trade barrier. If you look at EU policy as france and germany protecting their perceived interests by targeting US …

  10. comment
    Comment #20325383

    It's curious how when these people complain about corporations not paying taxes they reliably fail to mention that it's because of R&D tax credits. Not sure how wise it is for poli…

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #20265237

    The laws are fine, what we need is to not tailor laws according to selfish political whims or to the whims of publishers and all other inferior competition.

  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #20265020

    Luckily for Google in the US the grievances of a company's enemies/competitors don't count for much. I'll credit the WSJ for counting themselves among those enemies, but what I fin…

  15. comment
    Comment #20263062

    Eliminating tax deductions and the perverse incentives they entail would be a bigger boon than further taxing the successful and fortunate. The problem isn't a lack in revenue the …

  16. comment
    Comment #20233260

    Not really, adopting these apps is usually a modest investment on the users' part.

  17. comment
    Comment #20232846

    I don't mind the killing off of stuff that doesn't catches on it's a mark of dynamism.

  18. comment
    Comment #20232373

    I always thought the name had something to do with it, "google plus" doesn't sound right specially for a social network, also "Hangouts" is a terrible name, it doesn't internationa…

  19. comment
    Comment #20226746

    The author keeps conflating the "hate speech" talking points with what this investigation is actually about, it's like they can't help but pad the article with all their google gri…

  20. comment
    Comment #20161324

    What's the thinking here? Stopping the merger of the two insignificant players would only shield the major players from real competition.

  21. comment
    Comment #20151000

    The NYT is yet to publish a correction to an article publicizing a comically erroneous study suggesting a relationship between Facebook use and attacks on refugees in Germany: http…

  22. comment
    Comment #20126777

    No politics talk at work seems to be the rational and only solution here.

  23. comment
    Comment #20126768

    "Although the Financial Times’ sources don’t explicitly lay out Google’s argument, it’s not difficult to imagine how it would go." That's hilarious, a fourth party in speculating a…

  24. story
  25. story