Viewing profile — fvargas
fvargas
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Nov 14, 2015, 6:18 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 259
- Public activity
- 86 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About fvargas
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19243317
I only took a brief look, but I like the premise. The service seems far from something I would trust with handling my email. I still trust Fastmail (for reference). But I strongly …
-
comment
Comment #19243251
"We won't release any data without the required legal authorisation from an Australian court. As an Australian company, we do not respond to US court orders." [1] [1] https://www.f…
-
comment
Comment #19243221
Protonmail has also given in and paid out thousands* to criminals who DDoS their systems, no? *In my original post I mistakenly wrote "millions"
-
comment
Comment #19243190
> Your 1-year Standard subscription expires on Sunday, February 24, 2019. Good timing?
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #18523850
Thanks for sharing, this looks neat and useful! The pagemarks are an interesting concept. It would be cool if the top progress bar above the document showed, not cumulative progres…
-
comment
Comment #18288315
Based on the phrasing of the title, I half expected the "wheel" to be that belonging to a Tesla that somehow managed to remain engaged on autopilot for a week... would have been im…
-
comment
Comment #18055316
Fastmail has worked well for me with custom domains. It's nice being able to create custom aliases for when an address is publicly visible e.g. GitHub so I know through what funnel…
-
comment
Comment #16788162
Yeah, the primary benefit I see is if one fully audits the code and any future updates. Otherwise, self-hosting doesn't confer much in the way of guarantees for security or privacy…
-
comment
Comment #16786544
On what are you basing these expectations? Uploading means transmitting data to a third party. One could write a CLI that does just that. One could also write a web app where the p…
-
comment
Comment #16784831
Why would you broadly assume an incorrect rule? Email address parsers correctly implement canonicalization rules that consider the domain e.g. gmail. It doesn't require any extra w…
-
comment
Comment #16784750
The creator mentions in another post that the service does indeed upload the data to a server for processing. But, in general, it being a web app doesn't mean it uploads your data …
-
comment
Comment #16784677
By canonicalization I'm not saying any arbitrary practice by Gmail or any other email provider should be considered as standard. I haven't looked at the RFC in some time, but I don…
-
comment
Comment #16783796
The article shines light on three separate failures on Netflix's part: 1. Canonicalize email addresses Whether or not dots or +asdf is considered okay, an email address used for id…
-
comment
Comment #16783653
Just curious, why would you want to self-host it?
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #16306257
Perfectly reasonable. I would then suggest changing it from "Contact Us" to "hello@hreftools.com" to prevent any confusion (Principle of Least Astonishment) :)
-
comment
Comment #16306209
Looks neat! My one critique is the Contact Us link. I find unexpected mailto: links annoying because they cause my desktop mail client (which I don't use) to open unexpectedly when…
-
comment
Comment #16214305
Thanks!
- story
-
comment
Comment #16138721
Thanks!