Viewing profile — futurisold
futurisold
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 26, 2023, 7:30 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 166
- Public activity
- 58 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About futurisold
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47745185
Hi HN. I wrote a deep dive into the math behind the XOR metric used in DHT networks. It turns out it perfectly maps onto the bizarre, 19th-century idea of p-adic numbers. I include…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47459658
How I use agentic coding.
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47073736
why isn't this on the main page already? it's something very useful and well-done!
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #44408128
Thank you to everyone for participating in the discussion and for your overall support! As I said, I didn't expect this. I'm always just an email or tweet away, so you know how to …
-
comment
Comment #44404465
Oh, definitely. I recommend you go for contracts. I've used something similar for a contract that iteratively "stitched together" a broken ontology graph. Here's some of the data m…
-
comment
Comment #44403784
Thanks for bringing this up. I'm fairly familiar with Peirce's triadic semiotics and Montague's semantics, and they show up in some of my notes. I haven't turned those sketches int…
-
comment
Comment #44403534
I'd argue it's all of them. Contracts simply make better agents. I believe it also gives a very nice bias on how to talk about agents -- as apps obeying contracts. If you find time…
-
comment
Comment #44403465
It's subjected to randomness. But you're ultimately in control of the LLMs's hyperparams -- temperature, top_p, and seed -- so, you get deterministic outputs if that's what you nee…
-
comment
Comment #44403378
This is the correct view. Since the instruction was ambiguous, the LLM did its best to satisfy it -- and it did.