Viewing profile — ftr45
ftr45
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 25, 2019, 1:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -14
- Public activity
- 43 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ftr45
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35183804
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #28038632
the question should be: ''why aren't any other governments doing that?''
-
comment
Comment #27814000
good
- comment
-
comment
Comment #26186433
>If the electricity for a vertical farm is supplied by solar panels so use nuclear
-
comment
Comment #25467026
surprisedpichaku.jpg
-
comment
Comment #25385136
cyberpunk 2077 development is a warning about the future
-
comment
Comment #25343315
that's obviously false, alien would never contact israel or usa
-
comment
Comment #24835664
me too
-
comment
Comment #24752753
the world need both a green deal to de-carbonize and electrify other sectors and a nuclear new deal to provide the necessary energy
-
comment
Comment #24453253
nuclear is practically the only option to completly decarbonize our energy not only electricy but transport , heat and industry , renwebles can't produce energy continuosly and are…
-
comment
Comment #22129731
sure still the nuclear arsenal is in the hand of an unstable and probably mentally hill individual
-
comment
Comment #22129704
you are completely right
-
comment
Comment #20723997
that doesn't change the fact that tolerance should be limited
-
comment
Comment #20723991
no you take that sentence out of context
-
comment
Comment #20317612
''new method of keeping the lights on if the world turns to 100% clean, renewable energy'' probably bs ''New research by Mark Z. Jacobson'' ok this is surely bs
-
comment
Comment #19638361
this is bullshit ,scientifically a process is irrelevant ,glyphosate is safe
-
comment
Comment #19632505
>Better solar, wind, etc., has fewer risks than better nuclear tech in the long run. no https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-d...
-
comment
Comment #19632495
>That has little to do with the decommissioning itself, yes they cut the main source of green energy
-
comment
Comment #19632479
>The worst of the lies about nuclear is that it can somehow help create a carbon-neutral economy. Of course it wouldn't nope
-
comment
Comment #19632396
> That cost is not reflected in current electric rates nope ''In fact, the carbon-intensity of French electricity has increased. After years of subsidies for solar and wind, France…
-
comment
Comment #19632373
>Shellenberger has zero credibility. not an argument , bring proofs he's wrong
-
comment
Comment #19612812
>Solar costs have fallen very rapidly. proof? beacuse using solar and wind bring a rise in the cost of energy https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/02/05...
-
comment
Comment #19612774
that's not the only cost of renewables,look at germany and france https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/02/05...
-
comment
Comment #19612753
https://www.iea.org/statistics/?country=WORLD&year=2016&cate...