Viewing profile — froobius
froobius
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 03, 2025, 8:01 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 137
- Public activity
- 43 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About froobius
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49189094
I'm starting to wonder if any of this is better than local newspapers, where there's an editor with oversight over all content...
-
comment
Comment #48991365
You can run a lot of these on e.g. M1 max 64gb
-
comment
Comment #48733257
Erm that's higher than the healthy BMI range, so not "fairly light". >25 is considered overweight.
-
comment
Comment #47419022
On the other hand, taking backwards compatibility so seriously is a big part of the massive success of Python
-
comment
Comment #47367898
It's very clear that the consumer is getting a worse experience than what is technically possible. There is no good phone-slash-laptop, purely because it's less profitable than loc…
-
comment
Comment #46120025
I couldn't see any citations or references in that video or its description. It presents it as him solving the problem himself, but I'm sure other people have written about solving…
-
comment
Comment #46109537
And the news just now is that the chair of the OBR has resigned because of this [1] [1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cly147rky81t
-
comment
Comment #46081570
Hmm it can capture more than just single words though, e.g. meaningful phrases or paragraphs that could be written in many ways.
-
comment
Comment #45993921
> There isn't an idea that "IQ is some innate fixed quality" Actually yes there is; I have come across many people who believe this, specifically saying that IQ is fixed. > that in…
-
comment
Comment #45993378
See also: "Major IQ differences in identical twins linked to schooling, challenging decades of research" [1] [2] I.e. the idea that IQ is some innate fixed quality has evidence aga…
-
comment
Comment #45788882
> Any leakiness in BackProp is addressed by researchers who introduce new optimizers > As a developer, you just pick the best one and find good hparams for it It would be more corr…
-
comment
Comment #45713172
YouTube has so much questionable content on it that gets millions of views... Parents who've found ways to monetize their kids. Dangerous / unpleasant pranks being pulled on member…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #45685475
Stuff like this feels like some company has managed to monetize an open source object detection model like YOLO [1], creating something that could be cobbled together relatively ea…
-
comment
Comment #45655442
I agree, the post above you is patently wrong / hasn't read the paper they are dismissing. I also got multiple downvotes for disagreeing, with no actual rebuttal.
-
comment
Comment #45655019
I think the main thing to clarify is: It's not a uniform distribution after the first measurement, t_obs. That enables us to update the distribution, and it becomes a decaying one.…
-
comment
Comment #45648785
> Model state is present only in so-far-generated text Wrong. There's "model state", (I assume you mean hidden layers), not just in the generated text, but also in the initial prom…
-
comment
Comment #45647284
Ah no, it is the Copernican principle, in mathematical form.
-
comment
Comment #45646855
Yes that's pretty much it. There will be a decaying probability curve, because given you could fail at any time, you are less likely to survive for N units of time than for just 1 …
-
comment
Comment #45645466
(Just to expand on that, it's true not just the for the first token. There's a lot of computation, including potentially planning ahead, before each token outputted.) That's why sa…
-
comment
Comment #45644962
That's a paradox that comes from getting ideas mixed up. The most likely time to fail is always "right now", i.e. this is the part of the curve with the greatest height. However, t…
-
comment
Comment #45644118
That's inverted, it would be: If: P(1 more minute | 1 minute so far) = x Then: P(1 more minute | 2 minutes so far) > x The curve is: P(survival) = t_obs / (t_obs + t_more) (t_obs i…
-
comment
Comment #45643417
> while this Copernican principle sounds very deep and insightful, it is actually just a pretty trite mathematical observation It's important to flag that the principle is not trit…
-
comment
Comment #45643129
Ah, that's not correct... That explains why you think it's "trite", (which it isn't). The distribution is uniform before you get the measurement of time taken already. But once you…
-
comment
Comment #45642654
You've added some useful context, but I think you're downplaying it's use. It's non-obvious, and in many cases better than just saying "we don't know". For example, if some company…