Viewing profile — friendlydude12
friendlydude12
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 22, 2018, 11:04 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 47
- Public activity
- 34 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About friendlydude12
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17365118
I’m not saying that 1 Syntactic constructs in general should and do have meaning. The meaning isn’t inherent, but nothing has inherent meaning. log(x) has no inherent meaning, but …
-
comment
Comment #17364675
But your formulation isn’t right because it’s not about the UB code being detectable at compile-time or run-time, it’s about describing how the UB code should behave regardless of …
-
comment
Comment #17364142
It doesn’t need to be unable to be precluded at compile-time to be UB. The expression “1 Doing something at runtime is a different concept from having a runtime. In any case, C, in…
-
comment
Comment #17362232
Undefined behavior doesn’t exist to ease portability per se, it exists to handle meaningless yet syntactically valid constructs. Shifting by a negative number is meaningless and is…
-
comment
Comment #17215874
Agreed, why not attach it to the internal USB bus? Maybe it’s a sourcing / business deal thing. I’m theorizing most laptop manufacturers have made a deal with m.2 pcie wifi produce…
-
comment
Comment #17210517
Inspiring story. My uncle was in prison for most of my childhood, when he got out my dad helped train him for a job in IT. It wasn’t easy since the idea of making money using a ski…
-
comment
Comment #16776286
I wish there were more technical details on kaleidoscope. Just seems like lots and lots of borderline-meaningless high-level overview.
-
comment
Comment #16776187
That’s my point.
-
comment
Comment #16776070
How about they all pose a serious threat to privacy?
-
comment
Comment #16776019
Wasn’t sure which direction he was going in but now I see. That’s incredible satire. Thumbs up.
-
comment
Comment #16775923
Yeah the “fake news” narrative only serves the large media corporations that want to maintain their monopoly on content. Over time more news sources, including “fake” ones, will ac…
-
comment
Comment #16775891
Yeah it’s completely untrue. There were lots of very powerful weapons available in those days that rival today’s assault weaponry (even from medieval times) and the 2nd amendment m…
-
comment
Comment #16775820
Never made that claim but thanks for the info.
-
comment
Comment #16775788
The first amendment isn’t intended for physical speech. It exists to protect opinions and ideas. It’s for this reason lots of non-verbal “speech” is protected under the first amend…
-
comment
Comment #16775769
And they are totally wrong because there were all sorts of machine guns and powerful cannons available in those days, even some used in the Revolutionary war. Projectile weapons ha…
-
comment
Comment #16775663
The Founders had more foresight than you think. These were enlightenment thinkers who were well versed in the history of governments and technological progress. The Bill of Rights …
-
comment
Comment #16775579
It’s not clear that throwing money at the problem will fix it. I don’t know if critical thinking is even really taught in school.
-
comment
Comment #16775498
Being able to physically run your mouth in public has little to do with free speech, including shouting fire in a movie theatre. Free speech is the ability to express any opinion o…
-
comment
Comment #16775435
The market isn’t static, it’s dynamic. The plethora of news sources will over time force consumers to think more critically about their information, since there is an inherent desi…
-
comment
Comment #16771862
I think a big problem with metadata-aware “file systems” is that the metadata is lost once the file is exported out of the system. This is a problem with ID3 tags for instance. Ano…
-
comment
Comment #16771831
What did I just read?
-
comment
Comment #16503197
Desperate for book sales.
-
comment
Comment #16479825
The same terminology being used for distinct concepts is indeed a potential source of confusion. If you were to say “this is a constant time algorithm” I would need more informatio…
-
comment
Comment #16474181
No. I’ve known about timing attacks for as long as I can remember. In any case, any specific individual’s familiarity with timing attacks doesn’t change the fact that using the ter…
-
comment
Comment #16472224
There exists a constant, K, such that T(n) Furthermore, even though T(n) is bounded by a constant, it is not constant itself and its runtime is proportional to the amount of prefix…