Viewing profile — fredsters_s
fredsters_s
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 14, 2011, 10:51 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 990
- Public activity
- 212 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About fredsters_s
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48804461
> You could easily spin up a forum where power users help each other tell me you've never run anything without telling me you've never run anything...
-
comment
Comment #48659392
it is very funny that most of the (presumably germans) in the comments are saying "it's not that bad and it's fine because you chose a complicated LLC structure"
-
comment
Comment #48656682
you might enjoy cities: skylines
-
comment
Comment #41166990
Super awesome, love the vision, exciting to try something in this space, and agreed with your core observations and conclusions. My only criticism is that the interior / package ne…
- story
-
comment
Comment #38086442
the twitter convo is pretty good, but AMA here if you're interested!
-
comment
Comment #34595678
moving from offense to defense... tends to be a bad sign
-
comment
Comment #33424179
been using the beta - really love it
-
comment
Comment #28957048
yes :)
-
comment
Comment #28949841
Oh good catch Todd, sorry about that - updated. And totally agreed, both products take a slightly different approach and have different strengths and weaknesses, try them both and …
-
comment
Comment #28949820
it kinda is :) - 10 years in, we're just getting started!
-
comment
Comment #28948406
the other major difference is the design principles: our core belief is that everyone owns quality, and so we build for the 'no code' user as well. It's a really hard bar to hit, b…
-
comment
Comment #27698759
Nowhere do we say that the entire product organization - devs, designers, PMs - should not care about quality. It's a question of ownership and focus.
-
comment
Comment #27698748
First off, we totally agree on this: "true product Quality is dependent upon an endemic cultural philosophy of an organization." What we're asking you to consider is how much of th…
-
comment
Comment #27698729
We have a free trial - you should try it instead of criticizing theory, I would love to get your feedback on the actual product, here or directly (I'm fred@rainforestqa.com). Regar…
-
comment
Comment #27698676
> to say developers should not be interest or responsible for quality is most certainly a cop out Read the piece - it says no such thing. It's talking about 'ownership', which is d…
-
comment
Comment #27697158
I totally see your point here - it's frustrating that how I presented it undermined the impact of the core point, which is that siloed ownership of quality is an anti-pattern, and …
-
comment
Comment #27697056
[author here] You are absolutely right: the optimal setup is a cross-functional team of domain experts collaborating on solving the customer's problem. The article is meant to poin…
-
comment
Comment #27697031
I think the ideal team setup is one you allude to: a cross-functional team with experts from each domain collaborating together. My intent was not to say that can't happen - but th…
-
comment
Comment #27697013
[author here] Both are solid points! Regarding the incentive structure, I think you're right - there's no way to eliminate the friction that comes from competing incentives. Our ex…
-
comment
Comment #27696957
this has been our experience as well - sadly, however, most (all?) teams specialize and silo as they scale, and so you don't tend to see this setup beyond the very early stage
-
comment
Comment #27349931
There are obviously substantive issues with the messaging - however, the piece reads like a hand-wavey bad-faith attempt at creating controversy for internet hype, for an upcoming …
- story
-
comment
Comment #23920429
I don't disagree, but not sure how you can make that claim given that you didn't ever experience your idealized version (which never existed after the 70s)
-
comment
Comment #23704714
it's too bad really, the long-haul price competition they created on their routes was fantastic