Viewing profile — frde_me
frde_me
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Feb 19, 2024, 1:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 197
- Public activity
- 66 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About frde_me
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49221291
Knowing how to break into someone else's network will make you a lot better at making your own network secure.
-
comment
Comment #48891236
> what semi-celebrity they like the most The language in question here is maintained by a BDFL, which means that one person has outsized influence on the language, and it's directi…
-
comment
Comment #48560828
That's something for us and benchmarks to decide However it definitly isn't _just_ Kimi. The weight will be different after that 85% of extra training on top of the base model. If …
-
comment
Comment #48558587
Replied on the other comment about this, but putting it here: > See here https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-5 > 85% of the compute for the final model is from them, and not the bas…
-
comment
Comment #48558571
See here https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-5 85% of the compute for the final model is from them, and not the base Kimi model.
-
comment
Comment #48558137
Calling it an IDE is under-representing cursor They have in-house models, and the data to train even more powerful ones. The cursor team is a proper AI lab.
-
comment
Comment #48434998
I can understand words, but having more diverse medias for communication lets a person express strictly more than before. Sometimes words are better, sometimes a visual demo is bet…
-
comment
Comment #48434006
I honestly much prefer this to the old way where the only mode of communication was speech or text. I now often understand a lot more holistically what the person coming with their…
-
comment
Comment #48424107
I'm guessing the parent is wondering why this is noteworthy enough to be posted and discussed in this thread, and so if there's context they are missing
-
comment
Comment #48141301
Even before AI, deterministic checks by compilers are almost always better than "review the code" "review the code" as a solution will eventually fail and cause a problem, even pre…
-
comment
Comment #48077946
The cool thing is the author doesn't actually have to convince anyone
-
comment
Comment #47805371
Going on an old legacy website, downloading reports, summarizing them, and then doing things based on those Or basically any app without MCP capabilities I ask the AI daily to summ…
-
comment
Comment #47805282
I enabled the computer use plugin yesterday. Today I asked it to summarize a slack thread, along with a spreadsheet without thinking about it I was expecting it to use MCPs I have …
-
comment
Comment #47480522
Aren't you describing why they use mixture of experts? Where a sub-set of weights are activated depending on the query?
-
comment
Comment #47477796
Out of curiosity, are there any sources to there being a significant amount of other steps before being fed into the weights Security guards / ... are the obvious ones, but do you …
-
comment
Comment #47344242
So it's intentional to make people pass down raw strings versus making the communication safe(er) by default?
-
comment
Comment #47184441
One could argue a smaller number of employees that are more motivated and feel connected to their coworkersis better than a more employees that are all isolated and "meh".
-
comment
Comment #47165411
You see, in my circles (me included), people are shifting _to_ codex since 5.3 codex came out. The only places where I hear people say claude is better is: - Frontend design - Rand…
-
comment
Comment #47132000
> I get it that in 10 years all of this might peak and we're gonna be content using old models I would personally be happy using gpt 5.3 codex for the foreseeable future, with just…
-
comment
Comment #46997973
What exact models were you using? And with what settings? 4.6 / 5.3 codex both with thinking / high modes?
-
comment
Comment #46905770
It's hard to explain, but I've found LLMs to be significantly better in the "review" stage than the implementation stage. So the LLM will do something and not catch at all that it …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46772992
My reaction in that case is that most other readers of the codebase would probably also assume this, and so it should be either made clearer that it's stateful, or it should be ref…
-
comment
Comment #46640135
I mean, I'm shipping a vast majority of my code nowadays with Opus 4.5 (and this isn't throwaway personal code, it's real products making real money for a real company). It only fa…
-
comment
Comment #46640033
If it did, would it change its usefulness in terms of the value it outputs? (through agreed, if I had to pay money it would increase the cost, and so the tradeoff)