Viewing profile — fraytormenta
fraytormenta
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 08, 2015, 4:07 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 32
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About fraytormenta
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27313802
An interesting post about Python security and how it suffered from chasing performance.
- story
-
comment
Comment #21311665
I run with LG Gram 14" with Ubuntu Mate - happy!
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #13283115
ok i think i know what happened: Obama forced FBI to produce the report, but they got nothing, so they filled it mostly with irrelevant slightly-more complicated mumbo jumbo than O…
-
comment
Comment #12686648
hey I am glad that you are an expert and your criticism is of this nature! With my limited knowledge, I see exactly what you mean and I agree with you. There is another difference,…
-
comment
Comment #12685310
Legit criticism, I actually tried to get a clarification on that, what those words mean exactly. I read most of the CNN doc and went ahead and wrote that, because I felt that it wa…
-
comment
Comment #12685244
I did look up recent findings and they were meager. I followed your advice and looked up "Complex Traint Analysis." It is also quite meager. Were you able to find something close t…
-
comment
Comment #12685208
The "super-CPU" that you have described has to come from the same DNA. So if you take bits away from behavior to make "super-CPU," the definition of the "super-CPU" has consumed th…
- story
-
comment
Comment #12240878
Lady, I have some Russian friends who are convinced electricity was invented in the Soviet Union. This conversation is shaping up in the same line of rhetoric. You need a mental jo…
-
comment
Comment #12239050
I am quite familiar with the material, and I am convinced you got the entirety of it wrong, like somebody gave you a carefully picked and edited selection of it. Here is the wiki c…
-
comment
Comment #12238158
@dalke, you are asking good questions. Regarding France, Louis X had already abolished slavery much much earlier in the 14th century, motivated by the Bible. Yes, later there was a…
-
comment
Comment #12237834
I submit to you, that you are right, if your assertions are right. However, I find your summations in need of further research. I do not think they fit reality to satisfy your expl…
-
comment
Comment #12236954
Sure I can concede your point here, but, my man, you are quoting an article on "Christian Humanism" - you are proving my point. The Enlightenment is also a direct outcome of the Eu…
-
comment
Comment #12236714
mike, I believe you slightly mistook my point. I was not saying that interpretation is a purely subjective matter. I said that, regarding ending slavery, your interpretation of wha…
-
comment
Comment #12236677
brother that's accurate, but also misdirected. Prolonged support for slavery in the Christian community does not negate the undeniable fact that is the Christianity community under…
-
comment
Comment #12236668
Everything is interpreted if it passes through a thinking brain. There is no point in trying to avoid interpretation, but it is good to aim for high quality in interpretation. In c…
-
comment
Comment #12236656
Hey thanks for clarifying. You didn't say this directly, but I think I was misled by this convoluted statement: "The Catholic church didn't have to rewrite all documents everywhere…
-
comment
Comment #12234740
Friend, I'll answer to your last point because it is the most misguided. The Church of the East had its own course independent of the Catholic Church. By the early 13th century the…
-
comment
Comment #12234596
that's not enough evidence. i asked for academic reference, because i don't think engaging an uninformed minority view is fruitful if the person presenting the view didn't bother t…
-
comment
Comment #12234297
Sure, but I got nothing to respond here to - a negative assertion cannot be proved or disproved. Do you have another causal historic explanation for the abolition of slavery? Do yo…
-
comment
Comment #12234279
mike, you are confusing the impressions you got from the text with the impressions historical actors that banned the slavery received. those are different things.