Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — foysauce

foysauce

HN member
Joined
Mon, Oct 08, 2018, 2:15 AM UTC
HN karma
13
Public activity
10 items

About foysauce

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48443793

    I'm seeing most people's arguments here explaining that remote work has given them the opportunity to voluntarily engage in extra curricular social functions. I think to them, they…

  2. comment
    Comment #48322082

    Yet here you are engaging with the article. In my mind, the clickbait title has done its job.

  3. comment
    Comment #46578694

    > couldn't be easier Except for the single step workflow: like you do on POSIX shells?

  4. comment
    Comment #36905683

    I can't speak for everyone, but in the 6 years and 4 companies I've worked for, we have hired only 2 front-end engineers. Full stack is simply what we want a vast majority of the t…

  5. comment
    Comment #36620173

    I don't think I'm alone in that if I'm reading something that is anywhere near a 1-star, I don't finish it. And then go on to not leave a review. This skews my ratings indeed, beca…

  6. comment
    Comment #35218466

    Have been reading "What's Our Problem?: A Self-Help Book for Societies" by Tim Urban? I've been loving it, and he talks about the importance of 2 counterparties identifying what _i…

  7. comment
    Comment #35208820

    This is an era where "what you listen to" is entirely a personal choice, no 2 groups of people hear the exact same set of songs unless they want to. Same goes for movies, TV, any c…

  8. comment
    Comment #35002778

    Interesting that the top 2 comments (when reading this) are at opposite ends of the sentiment spectrum over the name. Personally I think it's one of those names that sucks to use i…

  9. comment
    Comment #34636381

    I believe a very similar use case was the original primary function of Richard's compression algorithm in the show Silicon Valley. Which of course was entirely underutilizing the t…

  10. comment
    Comment #31578568

    Fwiw, The "To" field in the email is "ExecStaff" so it's not completely inferred.