Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — fmap

fmap

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jan 15, 2011, 4:16 PM UTC
HN karma
785
Public activity
257 items

About fmap

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49080642

    Even if the test is run by an independent third party, they can always test open weight models against "finetuning attacks" or similar language which every model will fail for stru…

  2. comment
    Comment #48566626

    It's in Anthropic's best interest to focus the conversation on "distillation". Imo the more interesting thing to focus on is that there are now several more labs with the expertise…

  3. comment
    Comment #48528853

    > The actual opposing argument is that it's impossible to create a billion dollar enterprise without a group effort The other thing that we're often ignoring is that it's impossibl…

  4. comment
    Comment #47437369

    I agree with most of what the author is saying, but the slogan that "a sufficiently detailed spec is code" can be misunderstood as "a sufficiently detailed spec is a program". The …

  5. comment
    Comment #45390862

    Apologies if this came across the wrong way. I really do want to know what the novel contributions of the post are, because the author implies that something about what they're doi…

  6. comment
    Comment #45389654

    Isn't this an old idea? E.g., here's a textbook on optimization algorithms for matrix manifolds https://press.princeton.edu/absil and here's a library that implements this in pytho…

  7. comment
    Comment #44043276

    The reason deep learning is alchemy is that none of these deep theories have predictive ability. Essentially all practical models are discovered by trial and error and then "explai…

  8. comment
    Comment #43909857

    The usual way to check whether a definition is correct is to prove properties about it that you think should hold. TLA+ has good support for this, both with model checking as well …

  9. comment
    Comment #43591473

    I'm personally very excited about the progress in interactive theorem proving. Before the current crop of deep learning heuristics there was no generally useful higher-order automa…

  10. comment
    Comment #43582604

    > The idea is, if we don't think of anything more efficient, we'll at least be able to simulate a cat, and then an idiot, and then Einstein, and then something smarter. And since w…

  11. comment
    Comment #43581002

    > even if this doesn’t lead to AGI, at the very least it’s likely the final “warning shot” we’ll get before it’s suddenly and irreversibly here. I agree that it's good science fict…

  12. comment
    Comment #42547975

    Adding to this, inference is getting cheaper and more efficient all the time. The investment bubble is probably the biggest reason why inference hardware is so expensive at the mom…

  13. comment
    Comment #41077995

    Theorem proving can be formulated as a game, see e.g., https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-games/ and interactive theorem provers can verify that a proof is correct (and relat…

  14. comment
    Comment #41072771

    Agreed, this is a big step forward. Geometry problems are in a different class, since you can translate them into systems of polynomial equations and use well known computer algebr…

  15. comment
    Comment #40802325

    You don't get new theorems if you remove assumptions. Rather, you get the ability to add different assumptions. The Banach-Tarski paradox shows that classical set theory makes the …

  16. comment
    Comment #40756879

    This is NYSE specific: https://www.nyse.com/article/parity-priority-explainer

  17. comment
    Comment #40420969

    > it doesn't distinguish between "isomorphism" and "canonical isomorphism" You can distinguish these concepts in (higher )category theory, where isomorphisms are morphisms in group…

  18. comment
    Comment #40415680

    For this particular question we have a great answer in the form of homotopy type theory. It handles all the complications that the author mentions. This is one of the reasons type …

  19. comment
    Comment #39759887

    Others have already mentioned this, but Alan Kay spent his entire career experimenting with approaches to radically simplify computing. The progress reports from vpri give a good o…

  20. comment
    Comment #36128746

    I agree completely. I was just speculating on why there is so much discussion about marketing ploys in this comment section.

  21. comment
    Comment #36128376

    This particular statement really doesn't seem like a marketing ploy. It is difficult to disagree with the potential political and societal impacts of large language models as outli…

  22. comment
    Comment #36055441

    I don't think many people are arguing against having arbitrary byte arrays for storage and using application specific serialization formats. The real problem with file systems, imo…

  23. comment
    Comment #32864499

    Open any book on differential geometry and compare the treatment of differentiation with the needlessly index heavy treatment in any undergraduate calculus textbook. The point is t…

  24. comment
    Comment #22160853

    Wild speculation, but my guess is that both will continue to be developed. As far as I understand, the MLIR project predates its machine learning application and was originally int…

  25. comment
    Comment #20870085

    > Homotopy Type Theory doesn't really contribute much to logic Of all the things in this list, this is the one you think is odd? The idea behind homotopy type theory is a groundbre…