Viewing profile — flying-pig
flying-pig
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jul 19, 2023, 2:00 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 15
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About flying-pig
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #38740605
Tbh I can't follow your logic here. You mentioned that in VanJS there are things that need to be careful with. But the same is true for other frameworks, even for plain Vanilla Jav…
-
comment
Comment #38728240
With bundler like esbuild, all JS code, including 3rd party libraries can be bundled into a single file. You don't need an extra round trip for a library.
-
comment
Comment #38714210
Well said! You got the point.
-
comment
Comment #38714171
> when every framework ends up importing jquery anyways Evidence?
-
comment
Comment #38714151
No offense. What exactly is the cost of using "var" instead of "const"? You seem to pretend it to be a big deal.
-
comment
Comment #38713904
I don't get you. Could you elaborate?
-
comment
Comment #38713873
JSX is redundant, at best. VanJS demonstrated ordinary JavaScript syntax is as good as JSX, if not better. How can something feel sugar-ish if it's actually more verbose than ordin…
-
comment
Comment #38711419
The fact that you have to manually maintain the binding between states and UI elements and propagate state changes to UI elements is exactly the thing offered by VanJS, or other po…
-
comment
Comment #38709274
Agreed. JSX is a bug, not a feature.
-
comment
Comment #38709232
FWIW, VanJS's performance is very impressive. At least much better than React: https://vanjs.org/#performance
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #36945729
Very neat API indeed! Thanks for bringing it up.
-
comment
Comment #36786586
https://vanjs.org is another example in that direction. It illustrates that it's even possible to have a full-fledged solution of composing complex reactive DOM tree with just plai…