Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — flumpcakes

flumpcakes

HN member
Joined
Thu, Feb 20, 2020, 1:11 PM UTC
HN karma
2,642
Public activity
703 items

About flumpcakes

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49074349

    I don't understand your comment - the social norms I refer to are paying tax, sending your children to school, integrating with the local community, living in areas/accommodation t…

  2. comment
    Comment #49073750

    I think DHH's comments are pretty mild given the subject. However, I think it is how he frames his comments that cause offensive - lumping a (potentially) problematic (arguably) et…

  3. comment
    Comment #49073720

    I think DHH's opinion is a very common sentiment in Europe. "Gypsies" are a very European thing. I wonder if there's anything similar in the US? For context for US readers; they ge…

  4. comment
    Comment #49045427

    I thought it was very obvious throughout the video what was happening... Rust has compile time checks to enforce some safety. In comparison Fil-C is a lot more memory safe, it's mo…

  5. comment
    Comment #49045229

    I think you are concentrating on 'free' too much here. It's not about giving away resources, it's about serving the user. 1. No, a kiosk shouldn't be hooked up to some crime databa…

  6. comment
    Comment #49045197

    I think it was trying to find a moral standard that wasn't being set by established places. I think it was showing a level of self-reflection (going through a process of finding yo…

  7. comment
    Comment #49042304

    There are no 'unsafe' blocks in Fil-C. I think you trying to conflate 'unsafe blocks' with the fact that there might be compiler errors which might break 'safety'? Which is equally…

  8. comment
    Comment #49042246

    I think you should watch the linked presentation, it will show how it is "safer" than rust. Unfortunately there are performance implications, but fil-c seems fast enough to go into…

  9. comment
    Comment #49014115

    I can't believe these comments - passkeys are pretty easy to understand and most platforms allow you to add multiple. Not enough for truly one-passkey-per-device, but if you use a …

  10. comment
    Comment #48993760

    US politics is cooked. I wonder if polymarket will start taking bets on mid-terms being canceled.

  11. comment
    Comment #48971325

    That video is embarrassing. Theo clearly doesn't know what he is talking about at points, and is having a massive crash out for really no reason.

  12. comment
    Comment #48907371

    I agree with your sentiment completely. I think there's nuance that a lot of people don't bother with because of tribalism but your take is the one I most align with in this instan…

  13. comment
    Comment #48896412

    It doesn't need to expose something as new to point out a causal link? Someone saying that work-life balance means all work and no life, and then producing substandard quality at s…

  14. comment
    Comment #48858667

    > Nothing was ever said about the addictive design of mainstream TV - because then the rulers controlled the message being streamed into the brains of the population. More outlandi…

  15. comment
    Comment #48858637

    Any evidence what so ever for the "mass control" claim? I do not want E2E comms broken, but these posts on hackernews always bring out such outlandish claims. You can't be applying…

  16. comment
    Comment #48858614

    This is extending something that came into affect in 2011.

  17. comment
    Comment #48858603

    It already exists. Most CSAM tools are checking against a hash database. Why would you NOT want this to exist? This seems the only method to not raise false positives.

  18. comment
    Comment #48858573

    > Blackboxes which scan your messages and photos for anything 3rd party want with undisclosed criteria. Well the criteria is CSAM? Do you have any evidence that these systems have …

  19. comment
    Comment #48858538

    This is extending an existing law that expired. Really you should have felt betrayed back in 2011. This isn't Chat Control 2.0 - which is the thing that has been getting attention …

  20. comment
    Comment #48858456

    I assume those 400-page EULAs blast away any 'strict restrictions'.

  21. comment
    Comment #48798390

    The most obvious answer: to stop CSAM being shared on large platforms. Cloudflare has a tool that does it for some of their services.

  22. comment
    Comment #48796003

    Why is it currently illegal? If I have a service that let's users communicate, why is it illegal to look through those communications? (especially after they've signed my 400 page …

  23. comment
    Comment #48795890

    > Then forced through through some obscure mechanism bypassing It was extending a recently expired law that has existed since 2011. I don't think your comment is reflecting on what…

  24. comment
    Comment #48795862

    > Why do EU citizens tolerate this? Some EU citizens want it? You'd be surprised on the views of some people.

  25. comment
    Comment #48795851

    Perhaps the article is biased. The simple fact is that a law that existed since 2011 and expired in April is now back in effect. So we are back where we were on February. I don't r…