Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — flatroze

flatroze

HN member
Joined
Wed, Feb 17, 2016, 12:55 PM UTC
HN karma
361
Public activity
49 items

About flatroze

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #20783528

    That dependency is now gone, thank you for the review

  2. comment
    Comment #20782482

    Everything has its limits

  3. comment
    Comment #20779772

    Could you please open issue on github providing the output that you get in the terminal?

  4. comment
    Comment #20775872

    It sounds like a great add-on, I have to check it out to see what it does to remote assets and how it works with asynchronously loaded assets.

  5. comment
    Comment #20775866

    I'd say since monolith produces a plaintext document it lets you edit things easier if needed. JS can be removed from the final document using the -j flag. HTML Files can also be g…

  6. comment
    Comment #20775846

    The compile time is rather long as well, I'm looking into ways of reducing the amount of dependencies.

  7. comment
    Comment #20775837

    Thank you for the kind words. It will evolve into a reliable tool in a couple weeks and it should eventually work for embedding everything, including things like web fonts and @url…

  8. comment
    Comment #20775643

    There is nothing either girl or boy, but thinking makes it so.

  9. comment
    Comment #20775572

    Which license would you recommend to release this software under to reach the broad adoption yet permissive terms, if not the Unlicense?

  10. comment
    Comment #20775567

    It is done, option -i in the latest version (2.0.3) now replaces all src="..." attributes with src=" " within IMG tags.

  11. comment
    Comment #20775459

    CSS imports are covered by converting .css files into data URLs, later I will parse those and embed resources found within stylesheets as well.

  12. comment
    Comment #20775361

    It's a valid question. It seems to me users tend to trust things which have certain level of popularity and reputation associated with them. I personally prefer to hope for the wor…

  13. comment
    Comment #20775329

    Thank you for the heads up, I'll test it and enhance to preserve styles better.

  14. comment
    Comment #20775192

    Thanks, I'll look into making it work with pipes or some other way to interact with headless browsers.

  15. comment
    Comment #20775144

    Thank you for reminding me, I need to set action="" to be an absolute path when the page is saved. upd: Done, now forms get their action="/submit" converted into action=" https://w…

  16. comment
    Comment #20775124

    Well, at least it's not called iSuck.

  17. comment
    Comment #20775106

    Thanks! Pictures should work, I'll check more tags first thing tomorrow when I start working on improving it. I use youtube-dl for youtube and other popular web services myself. Em…

  18. comment
    Comment #20775068

    That's it in the nutshell! It seems to work for basic pages quite well, I think that lazy load will work for most pages as long as the JavaScript is embedded (no -j flag provided) …

  19. comment
    Comment #20775004

    Uh, I'm sorry. Please feel free to open PRs to that repo if you have anything to add or improve.

  20. comment
    Comment #20774906

    It for sure would help with those SPA websites that get their DOM fully generated by JS. A web extension that saves the current DOM tree as HTML would perhaps do a better job, espe…

  21. comment
    Comment #20774832

    Ah, I remember using something like that. I thought that tool was saving it into one .html file, but data URLs didn't exist back then, so creating directories alongside with HTML f…

  22. comment
    Comment #20774823

    This could also be an interesting alternative to PDF, especially with web fonts embedded as data URLs.

  23. comment
    Comment #20774819

    We'll bring it back, don't you worry!

  24. comment
    Comment #20774817

    The idea is almost identical, yet saving as .webarchive is only supported by Safari, and it's also not a plaintext format, hence can't be edited as easily.

  25. comment
    Comment #20774780

    Oh, thank you kindly. That's an interesting question. I think it depends on how the given modal is implemented, but closing them should technically work (unless the page is saved w…