Viewing profile — flashmob
flashmob
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 09, 2011, 1:43 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 277
- Public activity
- 152 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About flashmob
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
- story
-
comment
Comment #25788432
> The security model of Bitcoin comes from proof of work This is not the security model, this is the consensus model. It's based on probabilistic finality, meaning that the probabi…
-
comment
Comment #25003324
It wasn't shutdown for spam, and the service is not a spam service but an ant-spam service. The service has been sending out emails since about 2013. It only lets out a limited num…
-
comment
Comment #25003280
LE does in fact follow the link and use the contacts there 99.999% of the time. The site has been running fine on OVH for nearly 5 years without problem.
-
comment
Comment #25000046
Yes, I was under the impression that this is what they meant. It would have been great to be able to to chat so that I could learn more about how much this would cost, but as outli…
-
comment
Comment #24999180
of course - create any website open to the public where they can message each other, and there will always be some abuse. It's unavoidable. But what can you do? You can't police th…
-
comment
Comment #24998922
Admin of Guerrilla Mail here. I've been hosting the site on OVH since 2016. The site hasn't changed much during this time, and I've been quite happy with their services until now. …
-
comment
Comment #24998480
Nowhere on the website it says that it's an anonymous email service provider - it was an anti-spam email solution first and foremost. In fact, the email sending feature prominently…
-
comment
Comment #18651395
I'm also one of those who switched from PHP to Go and now I have quite a bit of legacy PHP code that just works and don't have time to rewrite. My solution: Use a Go FastCGI client…
-
comment
Comment #18375692
Yep. Also, he had to be careful not to say anything that would suggest that having a monopoly in the OS market would somehow benefit the dominance of the content busniess, it seems…
-
comment
Comment #18271411
Perhaps it the type of bug that only happens 497 days[1]? a few of these class of bugs slip through now and then (intiger overflow). 1. https://blog.ctm-it.com/it-support/blogs/mat…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #18113333
Let's start that you've been visiting a website called "Hacker News". Explain that to the customs goons when they ask you what is it.
-
comment
Comment #17679484
They did! Although not on the scale as the grand canal, but still impressive. Check out the "snowy mountains scheme", https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowy_Mountains_Scheme Quote: …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17537440
> They register again and again after the trial has expired This is great! You have users who are using your product, how could you not be happy? Find out why they are not converti…
-
comment
Comment #17492747
Counterpoint: Software engineers can just make it a configuration option and leave it to the user to decide how it is run. Unlike civil engineers who can't build a bridge with a co…
-
comment
Comment #17428262
Yep, it's a totally different culture. For example, there's a lot of motivation to protect the family's honor. The police will mediate between the parties before going further, and…
-
comment
Comment #17418054
Well, there isn't such thing as 100B in cryptocurrency, so definitely not in crypto. (It would be very hard/impossible to acquire that amount right now). This brings us to an inter…
-
comment
Comment #17400128
Oops, I see, was assuming it was used for MTA too! So there was never really a dedicated TLS port for MTA to begin with?
-
comment
Comment #17399980
Yes, unfortunately you'd be losing email. Port 465 has been deprecated a while back (1997). I guess that's the problem - there is no practical way to disable plaintext email from t…
-
comment
Comment #17399344
Yes - it's a weak argument, and one that's probably been debunked by looking the way https lifted off recently. My view is if port 465 was still around today, it would probably get…
-
comment
Comment #17399000
The STARTTLS vulnerability to downgrade attacks is a significant downside that port 465 doesn't have (if using modern TLS protocols at least). My opinion is that perhaps the severi…
-
comment
Comment #17398783
Perhaps fixing STARTTLS is one of those problems where the solution adds even more problems (and moving parts). BTW, what ever happened to SMTP on a dedicated TLS port (465)? Why d…